Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TC\s+Again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TC\s+Again\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. TC Again (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Amo" <jonamo@landracing.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 23:10:45 -0700; Just public info the rules committee voted 14 to 1 in favor of traction control, but the board overruled it. Just what I am reading on the message board, follow it here http://www.landracing.com/cgi; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00112.html (7,342 bytes)
2. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: Sparky <wmtsmith@landracing.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 1:36:57 -0600; I thing all americans should be Thankful that OUR board didn't represent us at the Contential Congreess in Philadelphia--or we would still be British Subjects--LIMEYS I personaly think that they shou; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00113.html (7,935 bytes)
3. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:40:08 EST; To bad, we will just have to lift our foot, if we want to go slower! jack; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00114.html (7,274 bytes)
4. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: jkamo@rushmore.com; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:01:22 -0700; with that logic, holding down on the brake makes you stop the fastest.........and anti-lock brakes proves otherwise......... Joe :) Quoting Nt788@aol.com: -- This mail sent by http://webmail.rushmore; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00115.html (7,577 bytes)
5. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:40:42 -0800; This is from the Land Speed Message Board and tell us what the REAL problem is. Thanks for the Reality Check Dan. Bryan Dan Warner <http://www.landracing.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_profil; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00116.html (9,150 bytes)
6. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:09:19 EST; Anti-lock stops "quicker" It is controllability issue not a speed maker. I use no logic. Jack; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00123.html (7,194 bytes)
7. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: jkamo@rushmore.com; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:30:33 -0700; some simply dont like being told what they cant do............. controllability, tire conservation, enhanced traction whatever one seeks to derive, to me its like saying you cant have a vertical wing; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00124.html (7,850 bytes)
8. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: jkamo@rushmore.com; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:30:18 -0700; oops, didnt know about the tc sensorship its too bad, it gleaned alot of interesting(to me) go fast related discourse............ Joe :) Quoting jkamo@rushmore.com: -- This mail sent by http://webmai; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00126.html (8,512 bytes)
9. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:35:27 -0600; I'm sorry Joe... I didn't mean it that way at all... feel free to bring it up all you like.... We've beat it up pretty hard was my only intent of that... Keith; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00127.html (7,056 bytes)
10. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:07:58 -0700; Might as well keep it going, we don't have the propster to haggle with.; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00130.html (7,386 bytes)
11. Re: TC Again (score: 1): Author: jkamo@rushmore.com; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:52:30 -0700; see propster IS the answer to TC.............. honey....were going propster......all thrust baby..... Joe Quoting Glen Barrett <speedtimer@charter.net>: -- This mail sent by http://webmail.rushmore.c; /html/land-speed/2004-11/msg00131.html (7,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]