- 1. Re: Handling on Salt - - Open rear end (score: 1)
- Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Leads me to question the wisdom of having a spool in our Winter's QC as opposed to a "posi" or "open" rear end. Anyone have thoughts about the different set ups? Don, I had an open in the Camaro and
- /html/land-speed/2006-09/msg00164.html (7,135 bytes)
- 2. Re: Handling on Salt - - Open rear end (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Odom <dlodom@charter.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:58:55 -0700
- Dick, I keep seeing this question asked. The problem is, LSR cars can be anything from a 108"wb, 60" tread width door slammer to a 225"wb, 18" tread width streamliner. Think about how different the e
- /html/land-speed/2006-09/msg00165.html (7,769 bytes)
- 3. Re: Handling on Salt - - Open rear end (score: 1)
- Author: Jane McMeekin <mcmeekin@columbus.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:27:06 -0400
- Thanks for the ideas regarding "Handling on the salt." Guess I neglected to identify the car in question- Its a door slammer with a wide track and a short wheelbase that runs in the 235mph range. As
- /html/land-speed/2006-09/msg00166.html (7,220 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu