- 1. HP/MPH (score: 1)
- Author: "Terry Hunt" <guambomb743@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 02:52:52 -0800
- Mayf, Dale and list, My poor computer skills are showing. I got the address wrong, but no harm done. I mentioned that my Studebaker went 200MPH with 493HP in 1998 thru 2000. In 2001, the engine was m
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00333.html (7,805 bytes)
- 2. Re: HP/MPH (score: 1)
- Author: W S Potter <wester6935@attbi.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 08:14:56 -0800
- Interesting. Perhaps the shape of the body above the air dam was part of the solution? I can't pull up the shot I wanted of your car for some reason but is that air dam slanted at all? Good thinking
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00344.html (8,100 bytes)
- 3. Re: HP/MPH (score: 1)
- Author: Nt788@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:03:16 EST
- << There's been some discussion about cars going faster after removing airdams, but in my case I went faster. Terry Hunt, Guam Bomb, #743. >> Sometimes when far from the action we 'I' try harder to b
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00355.html (7,091 bytes)
- 4. HP/MPH (score: 1)
- Author: "Terry Hunt" <guambomb743@msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 01:17:34 -0800
- Wes, The rule book does not allow the airdam to extend forward, so mine goes straight down. If it was legal I would have moved the lower edge forward. Terry Hunt, Guam Bomb, #743 ____________________
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00393.html (7,112 bytes)
- 5. HP/MPH (score: 1)
- Author: "Terry Hunt" <guambomb743@msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 01:32:29 -0800
- Greg, Glad your Studebaker project is moving along. I have never seen any aerodynamic information on Studebakers, stock or modified. I suspect 50 years ago that the cost to find this information was
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00394.html (7,235 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu