- 1. Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "atrav" <atrav@copper.net>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:06:42 -0400
- What is the process to determine the pulley ratio to run with a regular roots type blower? Suppose a 1000cc engine, a blower that claims 600cc of air will be passed per revolution, and say somewhere
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00224.html (7,404 bytes)
- 2. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 00:52:54 -0400
- Why a supercharger with all the parasitic losses? and not a turbo??
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00225.html (8,124 bytes)
- 3. Re: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 07:03:50 -0500
- Dave... having run the Supercharger with Freiburger.... I'll answer that... Because it doesn't involve changing the exhaust, it doesn't have the heat associated with Turbo's necessitating Intercooler
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00226.html (8,100 bytes)
- 4. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 07:39:59 -0400
- Trust me on this i think I might have more experience in this subject.. A poor choice for a 1 liter and even worse for Bonneville.. Oh and they both should have an intercooler. They both only half a$
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00227.html (8,840 bytes)
- 5. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:43:05 -0400
- For me the bitch'n car is the fastest one..LOL They usually sound the best as well. But if styl'n is what you are after well a different story there. I think that disease is referred to as 'chromatos
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00229.html (9,310 bytes)
- 6. Re: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "atrav" <atrav@copper.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:59:07 -0400
- Well, the class encourages 'traditional' blowers, and I have found a blower small enough, where as turbos for small engines are tough to find. Either way, it's getting a blower. The real issue is I'm
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00230.html (7,952 bytes)
- 7. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: jkamo@rushmore.com
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:04:53 -0600
- Dave come man.......its the uniting of retro and f'n bling...........the merging of old and new........ piss on it....not into either......... I am with ya dave.... if it doesnt make it faster...or s
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00231.html (10,416 bytes)
- 8. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:33:15 -0400
- Because they are easy to package and only run a small amount of boost that is generally only effective at high rpm so invisible to most EPA test cycles and have no impact on emissions. Not because th
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00232.html (9,081 bytes)
- 9. Re: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "atrav" <atrav@copper.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:49:53 -0400
- Water injection too? What are your opinions on that?
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00233.html (8,375 bytes)
- 10. Re: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:24:51 -0600
- Notice how Joe is sounding a lot like Jack Dolan. Must be some kind of biker talk.LOL Glen -- Original Message -- From: <jkamo@rushmore.com> To: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> Cc: "dan warner"
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00234.html (8,983 bytes)
- 11. Re: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:37:21 -0500
- I'm kind of enjoying this.... Joe and Dave are both deeply in the category of "been there, Done that"... they know the deal... understand what's best and aren't accepting alternatives... ( thou Joe w
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00235.html (8,848 bytes)
- 12. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:48:17 -0400
- people generally don't remember the second fastest anything unless it is A turbo for this 1 liter costs LESS new than a used supercharger and a header is usually simpler than machining up a bunch of
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00236.html (10,108 bytes)
- 13. Re: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert J. Denton Images" <foxriverkid@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:01:04 -0400 (EDT)
- Running just a blower as Keith talks about is tantamount to putting a fan (granted, a strong one) in your induction sytem. It doesn't do much. When we were kids we played with heater motors to run on
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00237.html (9,962 bytes)
- 14. Re: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Odom <dlodom@charter.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:21:16 -0700
- OK, I'm bored, its Sunday and there is no racing on TV and the grandkids are outside looking for Easter eggs. Now I have no dog in this fight. I'm a guy that for over 40 years has only raced NA Holle
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00238.html (9,707 bytes)
- 15. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:24:20 -0400
- I think he's got it.. Doug we talked data acq a while back and I tried to get back to you but didn't. My stuff will not be done for Bonneville this year. Give a call sometime and we can go over possi
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00239.html (10,635 bytes)
- 16. blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
- Bob Denton wrote; "if you can't change the density of the air, don't bother. Hmmm,. I wonder..... If perfect density would be called D with a value of 100, and you only had D-5 available, and you put
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00241.html (8,803 bytes)
- 17. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
- I agree that turbochargers are cheaper and simpler than superchargers, but if turbochargers are superior to superchargers in all cases, across the board, then why don't top fuel dragsters and funny c
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00242.html (8,507 bytes)
- 18. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:15:13 -0400
- Because they only need them for about 4 seconds and response rate outweighs performance. It is sometimes application specific and Bonneville is a poor application of a supercharger vs. turbo.. things
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00243.html (9,123 bytes)
- 19. RE: blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:31:28 -0400
- No you did not.. most of the boost is hot air.. At a much lower density..
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00244.html (9,335 bytes)
- 20. RE: Blower ratio (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Lackey <mike_lackey@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
- Last I checked the NHRA rulebook, it's because the rules specifically prohibit turbochargers. They could probably run faster yet with turbos. Mike Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protect
- /html/land-speed/2006-04/msg00245.html (8,746 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu