- 21. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1)
- Author: Nt788@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:15:33 EST
- << when we choose a catagory and class with an open record we felt very much that the onus was on us to set a "respectable record". We didn't want anyone to think we were "cherry picking".......I thi
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00994.html (8,671 bytes)
- 22. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:11:31 -0800
- racing (for I agree 100%. We should do away with all the "oddball" classes such as V4F/FMR and G/GR and XOB/GAlt that nobody cares about. As proof that no one cares about them, none of these records
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg01010.html (9,019 bytes)
- 23. RE: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1)
- Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:22:42 -0600
- Touche', Richard. I understood very well that I was leaving myself open. racing (for I agree 100%. We should do away with all the "oddball" classes such as V4F/FMR and G/GR and XOB/GAlt that nobody c
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg01014.html (9,342 bytes)
- 24. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Anderson" <boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:17:18 +0000
- Tou'Che Rich! I laughed my A-- off! ha ha ha Whack! right in the kisser! ha ha ha LOL! Hell, I'l still laughin'...... -way ta go Rich! Signin' off,-it's your pal,"Dirt Track Doug", ...STILL in exile,
- /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg01053.html (9,501 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu