- 1. Re: Bonneville article (score: 1)
- Author: "J.D. Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:48:15 -0800
- Liked reading the article. Reminded of all the others who thought it would be so easy to come and get a record especially at 101 mph -- Original Message --
- /html/land-speed/2006-11/msg00011.html (6,678 bytes)
- 2. Re: Favorite Tools (vaguely LSR) but lotsa fun (score: 1)
- Author: "J.D. Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:04:32 -0800
- Cutting his "end" a little short. Otto has the correct answer.....He said it so eloquently...I wanted to say but didn't have what are attached to it. Remember he said it.....
- /html/land-speed/2006-11/msg00106.html (7,089 bytes)
- 3. Re: How would you like 2 long and 2 short courses at (score: 1)
- Author: "J.D. Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:18:27 -0800
- When we only had one course it was done all the time. It was a way to keep things going.
- /html/land-speed/2006-11/msg00167.html (9,120 bytes)
- 4. Re: How would you like 2 long and 2 short courses at (score: 1)
- Author: "J.D. Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:34:04 -0800
- y did u shout When we only had one course it was done all the time. It was a way to keep things going. the Sooooooo what you're saying is it's been tried and it worked when we had 1 course!? Why woul
- /html/land-speed/2006-11/msg00170.html (8,915 bytes)
- 5. Re: How would you like 2 long and 2 short courses at (score: 1)
- Author: "J.D. Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:36:10 -0800
- i guess u don't understand y did u shout Me? Shout?I'm dazed and confused. Nothing new! Otto
- /html/land-speed/2006-11/msg00176.html (8,335 bytes)
- 6. Re: Wheel speed indicators. Not the forbidden traction devices. (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:07:31 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
- It's been done on a very fast liner with small indicating lights. The more lights were on the more the more wheel spin. Front wheel speed was compared to rear wheel speed. Slip was controlled by the
- /html/land-speed/2006-11/msg00209.html (8,323 bytes)
- 7. Re: Nish Motor (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:25:43 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- /var/spool/mqueue/: No such directory
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00007.html (6,737 bytes)
- 8. RE: MGs To Be Built in China ? What's NEXT ??? (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:03:30 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
-
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00013.html (8,597 bytes)
- 9. Re: No Chine Stuff, Real LSR.... (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:10:57 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- www.burnsstainless.com is an option for parts you may want. They also design headers to your engine specs. Nice site...J.D.
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00060.html (7,305 bytes)
- 10. Re: "M" Motor (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:54:33 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- It was the engine designation given to a midget motor instead of a cubic inch limit. Since it's inception the 2 sizes of engines allowed fit in "F" but were under the limit and if we said "F" we woul
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00081.html (7,708 bytes)
- 11. RE: Anti-corrosive lube for Magnessium to aluminum (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:01:33 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- GE Glyptol Insulating Paint is a great product. Spray and brush. We use it for a primer near the ocean because it works. . Over this, use an epoxy primer for electrical insulation.
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00084.html (7,612 bytes)
- 12. Re: "M" motor (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:08:50 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- That's why I said what I did. The originators did not want "F" motors. And remember they are Vintage. Engines and cars No Eslingers, Geretes, Fontanas, Sesco's, VW's, Mopars, etc..Bring on the Evinru
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00091.html (8,009 bytes)
- 13. Re: Grumpy reader - non-LSR (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:13:31 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- Gee Jon when I had the S--tters no one could have cared about them unless they were not where they wanted them...And please don't loose them...You have taken them to a new height. The one request I e
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00092.html (7,748 bytes)
- 14. Re: Rule Question (score: 1)
- Author: "J.D. Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:15:14 -0700
- It is not required, but what would you do if your auto trans or part of it blew up. I would ask Larry Volk that question as half his auto trans came threw the upper part of his roadster cowl and inju
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00141.html (6,976 bytes)
- 15. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:38:10 -0400 (EDT)
- You will hear this from others...BULLSHIT...True El Mirage has a 200 mph line but they go in order with the others who earned a good course as well......J.D.
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00175.html (7,813 bytes)
- 16. Re: third lane part 2 (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:12:17 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- Wes...... You are right....It's respect and consideration. Some have it, others will remain a--oles. As for moving them off the course. I always ask during during inspection if they need anything spe
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00179.html (7,172 bytes)
- 17. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:33:23 -0400 (EDT)
- You can not make a person now running who is trying to break a record which used 5 miles to do it a shorter course..If that's what you are suggesting.. Many records set over 175 could not be reached
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00195.html (9,380 bytes)
- 18. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1)
- Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:39:22 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- If they are running on a 180 or 185 record I see no problem. However if it's on a 230 record I feel they should not go there until thy reach a 1/4 mile speed and 1 mile which allow then to make it to
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00199.html (8,829 bytes)
- 19. Re: by the numbers.... (score: 1)
- Author: "J.D. Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 07:30:21 -0700
- If a system such as this were to go into effect, I for one, would be no longer available to assist the SCTA I any of the volunteering I now am able to do. As soon as I have completed inspection I wou
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00272.html (8,738 bytes)
- 20. Re: by the numbers.... (score: 1)
- Author: "J.D. Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:11:06 -0700
- I cannot believe anyone said this. Even though I'm sure they did. When there was one course, no one was in the pits and everything was done in line. This was when there was less than 150 entries. Qui
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00301.html (7,536 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu