Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Healey\s+Top\s+Frame\.\s+Can\s+You\s+Identify\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Healey\s+Top\s+Frame\.\s+Can\s+You\s+Identify\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Healey Top Frame. Can You Identify? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Svilans" <peter.svilans@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:27:15 -0400; Hello Josef. The late 100-Six/ early 3000 top bows can be easily distinguished from the BT 7 bows. The earlier bows are made of 16mm (5/8") diam. tubing and have cranked, or bent main "legs" with peg; /html/healeys/2005-10/msg00637.html (7,709 bytes)
2. Healey Top Frame. Can You Identify? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Svilans" <peter.svilans@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:42:51 -0400; Also on the top itself, the later 3000 tops have welded seams around the rear window, whereas the 100-Six and early 3000 tops had stitched in rear windows. Tenax fasteners on the early tops were the; /html/healeys/2005-10/msg00638.html (6,602 bytes)
3. Fw: Healey Top Frame. Can You Identify? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Svilans" <peter.svilans@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:21:14 -0400; I thought there was a third type of frame introduced with BT7 1528. Hello Josef, You're correct in that the type of bow introduced at 1528 was the "third" type, as the "first" was the 'permanently f; /html/healeys/2005-10/msg00657.html (8,475 bytes)
4. Re: Healey Top Frame. Can You Identify? (score: 1): Author: "Mark and Kathy" <mgtrcars@galaxyinternet.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:03:09 -0500; Peter, is there any chance that you could send these to the Healey web page where they will post these pics for the archives and future reference. Bob Haskel is the contact on that I believe. I would; /html/healeys/2005-10/msg00662.html (9,888 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]