Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Suspension\s+Thoughts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Suspension\s+Thoughts\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. RE: Suspension Thoughts (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:21:44 -0800; Wow, now that's interesting. The kind of modification that would absolutely meet tech criteria for probably every sanctioning body--if only because they couldn't detect it. I'll play with that. It mi; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00342.html (10,170 bytes)
22. RE: Suspension Thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Dean Tetterton" <richtr@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:43:10 -0500; For the guy's running SCCA that is fine. Cut off the whole mess and put on unequal upper and lower A-arms and coil over shocks. Get out there and beat Those RX7's. But as for me, I like the back end; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00344.html (11,429 bytes)
23. Re: Suspension Thoughts (score: 1): Author: "edwardbarnard" <edwardbarnard@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:59:25 -0600; Interesting idea. Put enough engineers on something and you are bound to find as many different ways to fix a problem. Remember to get a shorter shock because the size Koni's and Spax we use now wil; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00350.html (10,196 bytes)
24. suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:00:38 -0600; There's one consideration regarding TR suspension that has not yet been I don't have a copy of the 1963 (or so) SCCA rule book, but having raced during that era, it sticks in my mind that the rules f; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00356.html (8,788 bytes)
25. RE: suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Dean Tetterton" <richtr@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:26:12 -0500; I just happen to have a 62 GCR. The section on Wheels, Chassis, and brakes for production cars: The following additional changes and modifications are permitted: j. The make and type of shock absorbe; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00357.html (9,629 bytes)
26. Re: suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:36:33 EST; Amici: All Gaul is divided into four parts. Vintage racers are divided into two...Purists and Hot Rodders. Both nice people, but my hats off to those like Uncle Jack! Bill Dentinger; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00358.html (8,379 bytes)
27. RE: suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:17:36 -0800; Hmmm. Okay. Sounded too good to be true. I tried it on FSGP last night and got a nice camber curve. Didn't do much to the bump steer, but it didn't really make it worse. Not a bad modification, and i; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00360.html (9,891 bytes)
28. RE: suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:30:48 -0600; Thanks, Dean,..........and, the principle used throughout the entire Production Car Specs was, "if it is not specified, then no deviation from stock is allowed........" or something like that. Of cou; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00362.html (10,580 bytes)
29. RE: suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Dean Tetterton" <richtr@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:22:12 -0500; Like Jack, I am not trying to judge. I was a SCCA tech inspector and I am afraid I still tend to look at things in that vain. I gave it up when the GCR got to be over 1 inch thick. I did get to learn; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00363.html (11,232 bytes)
30. Re: suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:14:05 -0800; I must have missed the beginning of this thread. BUT, I did ALL of the homologation with the SCCA during the 60's and we never had a telescopic shock version for sale. As in most cases you submit a k; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00364.html (8,126 bytes)
31. Re: suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:26:58 -0600; Doesn't this mean that moving the upper fulcrum inward, a la Irv Korey, would be equally "illegal"? Larry; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00365.html (8,446 bytes)
32. RE: suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Dean Tetterton" <richtr@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:31:04 -0500; The book I have list the following under TR-4 Approved optional equipment Anti-Roll Bar (02052-TR4) H.D. Comp Clutch (02051-TR4) Oil Radiator (02053-TR4) Rear Shock Absorber Kit (telescopic) (02054-; /html/fot/2003-02/msg00366.html (8,315 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 32
Page: [1] [2]