Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Springs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Springs\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. SPRINGS (score: 1): Author: "Ronald R Gates" <Ronald.R.Gates@usa.dupont.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:04:10 -0400; We are upgrading our front springs on the TR-4 . After some earlier threads on our fot site we got some MGB-GT front springs for the car . There were (2) types of MGB-gt front springs, early and late; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00219.html (6,951 bytes)
2. Re: SPRINGS (score: 1): Author: JAMESELBE@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:04:21 EDT; After reading the same e-mails I decided to install MGB-GT springs on my TR-4 while I was redoing the front end. The springs in the car tested at 292 lbs. while the MG springs tested at 462 lbs. I us; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00229.html (7,260 bytes)
3. Re: SPRINGS (score: 1): Author: Henry Frye <thefryes@iconn.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:22:37 -0400; snip I had the same problem with my TR4 racer. I sourced my MGB-GT front springs from Moss. My thought was the rubber bumper MGB-GT would have to sit higher to meet the federal mandate of 5 mph crash; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00231.html (8,209 bytes)
4. Re: SPRINGS (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@q1.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 22:52:23 -0400; we supply a majority of the tr6 uprated springs - fronts of course fit tr2 - 6. the springs are 396 lbs vs 321 +/- for stock. this is a 20% rate increase springs are accurate within 2%. normal spring; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00251.html (9,431 bytes)
5. Springs (score: 1): Author: Malaboge@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 16:34:59 EST; Fellow Fot'ers Does anyone have a spare set of the old V449 rear competition coil springs for a TR4A->TR6. I could really use a set if anyone has them. These were the really stiff rear comp springs f; /html/fot/1999-03/msg00011.html (6,201 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]