Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FOT\s+event\s+track\s+discussion\s+\-\s+Waterford\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FOT\s+event\s+track\s+discussion\s+\-\s+Waterford\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: FOT event track discussion - Waterford (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <drewst03@home.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:13:05 -0600; When I was at Waterford earlier in the year for a "hot laps" type of event, I found the track to be wonderful fun, but lacking runoff in many corners. It seemed that the price of failure was potentia; /html/fot/2000-12/msg00253.html (7,745 bytes)
2. RE: FOT event track discussion - Waterford (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:57:37 -0800; Cleary you've never run at SIR (Seattle International Raceway) where there's plenty of runoff in every direction. The only problem is that the runoff areas are full of trees--mostly alder, but a few; /html/fot/2000-12/msg00260.html (8,344 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]