Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Basic\s+Question\.\.\.Expected\s+Hp\s+Difference\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Basic\s+Question\.\.\.Expected\s+Hp\s+Difference\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:23:47 EDT; What would be the typical expected % difference in hp from a engine tested by itself in the lab dyno verses one tested as installed in the car at the rear wheels? Cary; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00106.html (7,500 bytes)
2. RE: Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: "racespit@mail.netzero.net" <racespit@mail.netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:15:53 -0400; I have heard you lose about 15% from flywheel to rear wheels, but of course I am sure that varies due to car, weight of driveshaft components, etc. Keep Triumphing, Susan :) What would be the typical; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00108.html (8,296 bytes)
3. RE: Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:10:00 -0700; Could be a lot more or a lot less, and that's the problem with rear wheel dynos. It's not predictable and therefore can't be adjusted for. Beyond tire slip, hysterisis loss in the tires, and drivetra; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00110.html (8,969 bytes)
4. Re: Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 17:22:45 +0000; I did a search last night to see what I could find on the web regarding chassis dyno hp vs. engine dyno hp. I found four sites that said that 15 - 20% was the difference, especially for cars of our h; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00111.html (9,236 bytes)
5. Re: Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: "R. Kastner" <kaskas@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:19:00 -0700; There is more problems with the slippage of the tires and the heat build up in the tires and the heat build up in the clutch. I would guess 20% is a reasonable number. Kas Kastner -- Original Message; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00120.html (10,058 bytes)
6. Re: Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:34:15 EDT; Timing 34 to 28: that's interesting...and consistant with another piece of information that I recieved. But what does 16/16 and 13/16 mean? Good thread. joe a; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00122.html (8,103 bytes)
7. Re: Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: "Hart" <wenal@adelphia.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 21:20:14 -0700; This stuff makes for great conversation here at home! Al suggests that on a rear-drive car, up to 40% can be lost. What he also includes to rob horsepower is the inertia of the rotating masses; ie, d; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00123.html (9,183 bytes)
8. Re: Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:39:58 -0400; I believe that they are refering to intake/exhaust valve lash. The intake valve is staying open longer at 13/1000 lash compared to 16/1000. Joe(B) piece of tune picked up 3-4 pings and backing; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00128.html (8,797 bytes)
9. Re: Basic Question...Expected Hp Difference (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:26:32 -0400 (EDT); As Joe B. replied these refer to the valve lash settings, intake/exhaust. It is likely okay to run the intake valves a little "tighter" than the exhaust valves. The theory is that the intake valve ru; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00130.html (9,100 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]