Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Fw\:\s+Evans\s+Waterless\s+Coolant\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Fw\:\s+Evans\s+Waterless\s+Coolant\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Fw: Evans Waterless Coolant (score: 1): Author: roggrace at telus.net (Roger Grace); Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:38:37 -0700; Derek ? you are correct and it will actually make a normal (un modified) engine run hotter ? it is almost 100% glycol with reduced heat transfer capability; you would be unaware of this increase in e; /html/fot/2017-04/msg00086.html (8,865 bytes)
2. [Healeys] Fw: Evans Waterless Coolant (score: 1): Author: austinhealeyslist at gmail.com (A H List); Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:52:03 +1200; Some info here http://www.oilem.com/potential-issues-with-waterless-engine-coolants/ "To summarize: Engines can run 45-60?C hotter (at the cylinder heads) with Waterless products. Stabilized coolant; /html/fot/2017-04/msg00090.html (11,081 bytes)
3. [Healeys] Fw: Evans Waterless Coolant (score: 1): Author: healeyrik at gmail.com (HealeyRick); Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 19:40:02 -0400; Like most of us, I've looked into Evans and have left confused. There really is almost no testing done of the product and the one I have found, http://www.norosion.com/evanstest.htm, is by a competit; /html/fot/2017-04/msg00093.html (13,117 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]