Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:FOSmith@aol.com: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 04:39:12 EST
This must be new because last year a friend of mine failed the smog inspection because the original air filter box had been replaced by a K&N type filter attached to the air flow meter. I had to help
/html/buick-rover-v8/2006-01/msg00000.html (6,752 bytes)

2. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:50:51 EST
You know it could be that the K&N filter is actually legal but the smog test station operators are so paranoid about CARB stings that they reject anything that even looks like a modification. They ha
/html/buick-rover-v8/2006-01/msg00001.html (7,682 bytes)

3. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:38:36 EST
Try some flexible aluminum heat riser hose. It comes in the correct size and is available in any parts store. It's usually painted black so it looks fairly original too. A K&N filter will cause you
/html/buick-rover-v8/2005-12/msg00004.html (7,893 bytes)

4. Re: [Wedge] TR7/8 FI air intake (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:47:15 EST
Unfortunately, California requires a visual inspection as well as a tailpipe test (and in some areas, a rolling road test). They consider the air cleaner box part of the emissions control system. Unt
/html/buick-rover-v8/2005-12/msg00012.html (8,759 bytes)

5. Re: [Wedge] fuel pump noise (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:14:33 EDT
Jay, FWIW, mine have been doing this for years. Some days they're noisy. Some days they're quiet. Fred Smith Orinda, CA 2 '81 TR8s /// /// buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-04/msg00003.html (6,904 bytes)

6. Timing cover question (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:14:06 EST
I have a question for the list. Is the Range Rover 3.9 timing cover with the tall water pump the same as the timing cover used on the TR8/SD1 version 3.5 engine? That is, will the TR8/SD1 water pump
/html/buick-rover-v8/2003-11/msg00015.html (6,456 bytes)

7. Re: Re: FW: [rro] Re: RRO: RE: Pros and Cons: 1994 Range Rover (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 01:19:37 EDT
/// /// buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/buick-rover-v8/2001-07/msg00009.html (7,105 bytes)

8. 4.2 engine (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 01:27:16 EDT
Sorry about the previous post. I hit the send button by accident before typing this message. Isn't the 4.2 a 3.5 with a stroker crank? A friend of mine put a Buick 300 crank in an SD1 3.5 engine and
/html/buick-rover-v8/2001-07/msg00010.html (7,937 bytes)

9. Re: Rover blocks (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 12:29:54 EDT
Hi all, I'm new to this list. I have a TR8 for which I'v just purchased a '98 Rover 4.0 short block (with cross bolted mains)to replace my 3.5. I'm now pondering what to do about heads, etc. My quest
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-08/msg00075.html (9,613 bytes)

10. Re: value of buick 300 heads (score: 1)
Author: FOSmith@aol.com
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 00:20:34 EDT
I saw a pair of bare aluminum heads go for $300 at a swap meet a couple of years ago. Fred smith FOSmith@aol.com
/html/buick-rover-v8/1999-05/msg00024.html (6,964 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu