Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*numbers\:\s+question\s+for\s+Durk\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*numbers\:\s+question\s+for\s+Durk\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. numbers: question for Durk (score: 1): Author: "Anthony Tabacco" <tony@atarchitects.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 07:50:36 -0800; Durk, did your post refer to numbers for annual tech or will novices still be able to use paper numbers for their first few events? Tony; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00140.html (7,101 bytes)
2. Re: numbers: question for Durk (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:25:49 -0500; I wonder if someone on the Steering Committee should be the "Keeper of the Numbers?" If we're going to get serious about requiring numbers, it seems someone should be available prior to events to ass; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00142.html (7,445 bytes)
3. Re: numbers: question for Durk (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:31:14 -0500; Assuming that Jeremy accepts that as part of the job! I'm not sure it was ever stated that the Reg Chief should take the book home and be available during the week to assign numbers... Jeremy??? Char; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00144.html (7,281 bytes)
4. Re: numbers: question for Durk (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:00:20 EST; If we're going to demand that everyone show up at their first event with permanent numbers, how can you assign numbers at that event? Charlie; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00145.html (7,300 bytes)
5. RE: numbers: question for Durk (score: 1): Author: "Bryan Nemy" <bnemy@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:17:38 -0800; If we are going to make these requirements we have to put them in the Supps. This can be discussed at our next SC meeting. We cannot do this now. You cannot make up rules as we go along. This is what; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00148.html (8,235 bytes)
6. Re: numbers: question for Durk (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:28:51 -0500; Bryan makes a good point. We have to change the supps (or just delete the supp, falling back to the Solo 2 Rule Book...) in order to enforce this. Let's discuss it in February... Charlie; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00153.html (7,951 bytes)
7. Re: numbers: question for Durk (score: 1): Author: "Doug Hubbard" <phubbard@infostations.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:04:44 -0800; Here was my point, the statement was put out that this was the way numbers were going to be on the cars and that was the only way it was going to be and that statement was wrong. Now you run into the; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00154.html (7,493 bytes)
8. Re: numbers: question for Durk (score: 1): Author: "Don L." <toy4speed@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:14:26 -0800 (PST); Hey All, was there a possibility that Durk may have intended the number and class requirements to be for annually teched cars, and not for every entrant? I could understand as the annual tech chief t; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00155.html (7,978 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]