Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Thank\s+You\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Thank\s+You\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:01:22 -0800; Yikes, we're really turned this into a urination for distance competition. ;) I think this would be pretty easy to settle... http://www.opentrack.com still has space for the February 12/13th event at; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00108.html (8,867 bytes)
22. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:24:02 -0800; Sorry guys, wrong URL. http://www.open-track.com -Kit -- ** Kit Wetzler http://www.mindspring.com/~kitwetzler "It's amazing how much 'mature wisdom' resembles being too tired." _Time Enough for Love; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00113.html (9,064 bytes)
23. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 12:13:12 -0800; I guess you don't mind being second best then.:)) And it's only 45 year good ol' American tech not one hundred year old. The wankel has been around at least that long also, if my memory is any good,; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00120.html (9,781 bytes)
24. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Sethracer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:43:44 EST; << Now put a turbo on one of those V8's and we'll see which one gets there first. You don't see any Top Fuel dragsters with wankels in them, or F1 cars, now, do we ???? Jesus Yeah - And you don't see; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00122.html (8,421 bytes)
25. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:05:57 -0800; Hey, you stay out of this.:)) If I remember right, I beleive you have to finish to win, don't you? Jesus; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00123.html (8,589 bytes)
26. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:06:37 -0800; The first wankel engine ever to run was in 1957. The first piston engine ever to run (steam powered) was in the 1700s. The piston engine has had about 250 years more development time than the Wankel; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00124.html (9,543 bytes)
27. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:24:09 -0800; Actually, since the Wankel has 3 "combustion chambers" per rotor [one per each side of the rotor], you should multiply the actual displacement by about 3... so the 1.3 x 3 = 3.9 or 70.3 hp/liter. The; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00126.html (8,585 bytes)
28. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:22:34 -0800 (PST); "To finish first, first you must finish." - Roger Penske Today's quote brought to you by Scot :) Do You Yahoo!?; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00127.html (7,979 bytes)
29. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:27:55 -0800; Mike, I knew you would have the correct info on the tip of your tongue. thanks for the correct dates. Jesus; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00129.html (9,468 bytes)
30. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Darren Madams <darren@madams.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:27:25 -0800 (PST); Must.... try.... not.... to.... respond........... ugh! Oh yeah? Well my 125cc kart motor makes about 32 HP... which is about 256HP per liter.... beat that wankel boy! But seriously, all our cars pre; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00130.html (10,831 bytes)
31. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:20:25 -0800 (PST); IIRC, the first Wankel-powered car came out in the late 60's, although I'll concede that development on the engine probably started in the 40's. The car, if anyone's interested, was the NSU Ro80. I'v; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00131.html (8,971 bytes)
32. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Vernon Head <vhead@fuelrtm.com>; Date: 25 Jan 2000 14:36:54 -0800; Ironically, GM experimented with a couple of Rotary Corvettes in 1973. One was 266 cubic inches, the other was a whopping 390! So much for lightweight, compact engines. They scrapped the whole thing; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00134.html (7,998 bytes)
33. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:10:08 -0800; Building a solid, reliable rotary engine is no easy task. The fact that GM couldn't do it should come as no surprise, and certainly not an indictment of the engine they failed to build. In the 1970s; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00140.html (8,495 bytes)
34. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Larrybsp@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:23:40 EST; I was working for the Eaton Research Center in the mid 70's in Detroit. One of the contracts we had was with Ford to develop a reliable tip seal for their Wankel program, not as easy as it sounds. I; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00152.html (8,161 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 34
Page: [1] [2]