Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Thank\s+You\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Thank\s+You\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. Thank you (score: 1): Author: SFRASER1234@aol.com; Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 19:55:37 EDT; Richard and I really want to thank everyone for all the replys. THANK YOU ARIE FOR THE TIRES! The ugly black Rabbit not only got first and second in FSP, but TTOD by approx. 1.5 seconds over any othe; /html/ba-autox/2002-05/msg00124.html (6,238 bytes)
2. Fwd: Thank you (score: 1): Author: BRMcapri@webtv.net (Ben); Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 18:00:37 -0700 (PDT); DSP #60 Racing is life. All the rest is just waiting. X-WebTV-Signature: 1 ETAsAhQRT07yIDWzhahfH69+rBWsuivk0gIUXPZdpnlOXZ+n3DclBW7seXWZEgU= From: BRMcapri@webtv.net (Ben) Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 16:21; /html/ba-autox/2001-05/msg00181.html (7,104 bytes)
3. THANK YOU (score: 1): Author: "Benjamin R. Martinez" <brmcapri@usa.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:57:13 -0700; To ALL that help out: T hank you to all the people that help out on sunday. I think that after we got started the event went well and Kevin step up big when he needed to, Thank you Kevin for making i; /html/ba-autox/2000-07/msg00250.html (7,660 bytes)
4. Re: THANK YOU (score: 1): Author: barry Spencer <bspencer@tsoft.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:05:36 -0700; What happened to the BIG thank you for the person who cleaned the complete Barry S; /html/ba-autox/2000-07/msg00251.html (8,096 bytes)
5. Re: THANK YOU (score: 1): Author: "Benjamin R. Martinez" <brmcapri@usa.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:22:15 -0700; Barry - I'm very SORRY for not saying THANK YOU for cleaning the complete course, I think it made a big diff. When you didn't see a big dust cloud in the first run groups and then the rest of the run; /html/ba-autox/2000-07/msg00258.html (8,709 bytes)
6. THANK YOU (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 07:39:39 -0700; Hey, what about me? I ran in the morning, but stuck around to tech all the 5th run group cars during the mid-day course walk. =P I thought the course was great, the weather perfect, etc...wonderful e; /html/ba-autox/2000-07/msg00264.html (9,561 bytes)
7. Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 17:44:15 -0800; Thanks to everyone who went to the banquet last night. For some reason, it took watching the first half of a road race banquet for me to realize what a special group we have. I have to really publica; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00061.html (9,696 bytes)
8. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 21:14:32 -0500; well... ? don't keep us potential A-stock drivers waiting... ;) -Kit; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00062.html (7,421 bytes)
9. RE: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 18:19:22 -0800; Oh. Well, ask Sal. I just don't quite have the heart. Katie S2000 well... ? don't keep us potential A-stock drivers waiting... ;) -Kit; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00063.html (7,809 bytes)
10. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Sal Versaggi" <versaggi@vom.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:19:35 -0800; I felt it was the Boxster.......... Although we did not discuss the weight of the two vehicles and the power to weight ratio....... Now if you were to ask me which one I would rather drive?..... Abso; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00064.html (8,679 bytes)
11. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:12:29 -0800 (PST); Sorry Kit, but I think Sal's logic went something like "torque over squirrels on crack". Of course, if you can keep your car between 6000-9000 RPM at all times, you should do fine.:-) -Andy Do You Ya; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00066.html (8,210 bytes)
12. RE: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Esra, Phil" <PEsra@air.org>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:37:51 -0800; Actually, the question in its entirety was "which is better for ProSolo, a 1995 MR2 Turbo or 2000 Boxster?" And if I remember correctly, Sal's answer was that whichever car had more torque should get; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00068.html (9,039 bytes)
13. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Sal Versaggi" <versaggi@vom.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:32:12 -0800; Phil --I think I did mention Road Racing some where in that context. :-); /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00070.html (9,517 bytes)
14. RE: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:49:46 -0800; Anyway, it's a good tip, but I don't know how useful it would be in a ProSolo. Sal, you have to come try one! Katie Phil --I think I did mention Road Racing some where in that context. :-) Sal --Orig; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00072.html (10,019 bytes)
15. RE: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:57:51 -0800; And I just remembered, we can't forget Charlie. He had a big hand in all this, too. And is it just me, or wasn't he just the best emcee of the evening? Katie K. Somehow I think Katie has put the ago; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00073.html (9,202 bytes)
16. RE: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:54:18 -0800 (PST); I'd say so. He's the only one who didn't put me to sleep! Scot Do You Yahoo!?; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00076.html (8,189 bytes)
17. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Teresa Neidel <teresan@corp.home.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:56:10 -0800; Somehow I think Katie has put the agony of endless hours of picture scanning way back in her memory. It's quite a collaborative effort. Thanks to Katie... her creative ideas made it come alive. -- T; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00080.html (8,619 bytes)
18. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:41:47 -0500; Torque-Smorque... I just need to watch the VTEC engagement point in sweepers. ;) -Kit, who plans to get his butt soundly kicked in A-Stock next year; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00081.html (8,477 bytes)
19. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 06:21:39 -0800 (PST); Torque? We don't need no steenking torque! Scot - no VTEC, but not much torque either Do You Yahoo!?; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00098.html (8,672 bytes)
20. Re: Thank You (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 09:56:58 -0800; Torque schmorque, torque is for wimps. Rotary rice burners don't have much torque but they go 0 to 60 in 4.8 seconds, and that's enough to beat most of those Vettes and Porsches. I'll take screaming; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00107.html (9,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]