Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SM2\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SM2\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. SM2? (score: 1): Author: Johann Schubert <jes@rx7.org>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:52:00 -0700; Is a D-Bar (strut tower brace or triagulated strut bar) allowed in SM2? No I can't find it listed in the rules online, yes I know if it doesn't say, it's not allowed... ;-) I thought maybe it's been; /html/ba-autox/2004-09/msg00042.html (6,519 bytes)
2. Re: SM2? (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:58:07 -0700; Triangulated braces aren't legal in SM/SM2. The braces that are allowed are "strut braces" which have to connect only two suspension mounting points with no fore-aft connections; and "subframe connec; /html/ba-autox/2004-09/msg00043.html (7,211 bytes)
3. Re: SM2? (score: 1): Author: Johann Schubert <jes@rx7.org>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:31:36 -0700; it figures... I was actually surprised to see suspension control arm changes allowed. Guess I'm still in OSP, unless I take off the bar from the tower to the firewall. Well at least it's down to only; /html/ba-autox/2004-09/msg00044.html (7,323 bytes)
4. Re: SM2? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:24:48 EDT; This seems odd to me. With all that IS allowed in SM/SM2, and the sheer number of strut braces that are offered with triangulation to the firewall, I would think it would be allowed. I can only guess; /html/ba-autox/2004-09/msg00045.html (7,134 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]