Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Defending\s+the\s+Wankle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Defending\s+the\s+Wankle\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Defending the Wankle (score: 1): Author: Dennis and Sherry Armstrong <Miata@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:38:39 -0800; I believe the Wankle produces quite a lot of power for it's size. Remember it only displaces 1.3 litres. And in production form on the last RX7 it produced 255 H.P. quite a lot of H.P. for an engine; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00180.html (7,317 bytes)
2. Re: Defending the Wankle (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:21:03 -0800; I just read about the new wankel and it's even more amazing: 275 hp out of 1.3 liters and they are normally aspirated.; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00205.html (6,869 bytes)
3. Re: Defending the Wankle (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:27:42 -0800; Darn it! it's 3.9 liters... :P rotaries are cool, but blowing the oil seals out the tailpipe sucks. :) -Kit, whose 86 GXL proved that to him; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00206.html (6,781 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]