Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+not\s+\"pro\"\s+cone\s+chasers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+not\s+\"pro\"\s+cone\s+chasers\?\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 11:34:06 -0400; Time to tip another sacred cow. :) This weekend, Detroit Region held it's Season Ender event, which drew (if I got the right numbers) 208 cars. A couple of these cars were new STU recruits. There wou; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01105.html (12,197 bytes)
2. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 20:40:04 -0700; dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote, in what I can only assume is a serious Welcome to amateur activities. My wife and I have to help out with our children's soccer teams, too. Nothing's free. So maybe th; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01107.html (13,253 bytes)
3. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:43:06 -0700; There was a period of time around here, and I'm sure this condition still other parts of the country, where an event was put on and manned by the sponsoring club, and all the competitors did not work; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01110.html (15,351 bytes)
4. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 22:19:01 -0500; Neat idea, let us know how it works out. :) I know where the smart drivers will be...out on course, learning. PLW; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01111.html (8,291 bytes)
5. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Alan Pozner <AlanP@identicard.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:49:11 -0400; <major snip> I think there are several important parts that DG left out of his proposal of hiring high school kids to be corner workers 1) Taxes - if we hire part-time workers we need to pay their pa; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01117.html (9,226 bytes)
6. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Mdmtrsport@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:16:56 EDT; There is a point here. The reason why I did not get involved in Southern California autocrossing was the very reason made here: Three runs, wahoo, then two hours chasing cones. Which I usually didn't; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01118.html (10,452 bytes)
7. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: The Narbys <narby@centurytel.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:30:59 -0700; <major snipping> I think that an autocross is about the most fun I can have for the amount of money it costs me, and working keeps the price low. I run Prepared too, which means less time on course,; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01119.html (9,338 bytes)
8. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Jamie Sculerati <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:24:22 -0400 (EDT); Nope -- I worked part-time for the school district when I was in high school. They withheld all the normal taxes like any other paycheck I received. So long as they were signed up as "participants" a; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01122.html (10,263 bytes)
9. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:50:27 -0500; <then misattributes to me a quote from Dennis> Southern runs, wahoo, That's autocross. If you think about it, there are not a lot of options to substantially change that. That's certainly a decision; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01123.html (10,291 bytes)
10. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:15:12 -0500; Thank goodness this statement is completely untrue. Not that chasing cones is social hour or anything, but it's a great way to get to know some of the racers whom I would not normally meet. IMHO, I; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01124.html (9,357 bytes)
11. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:08:19 -0400; Yes, but the nifty thing is you don't have to pay those who are offshift. 25 people working for 8 hours, or 200 people working for 1 hour works out the same in terms of cost. Of course, the shorter y; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01125.html (11,913 bytes)
12. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:39:34 -0500; while, seen much, responses instead Then again, there are others out here who see most of your ideas as some sort of involuntary spasm akin to peristaltic reversal. And even then, some of us do offer; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01127.html (9,931 bytes)
13. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Jenaro Rodriguez <jenaro@mciworld.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 07:36:08 -0700; I have another alternative that would probably work for large regions; let some the people work double shifts and not pay for registration. Then let some of the people who don't want to shag cones pa; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01128.html (14,144 bytes)
14. RE: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Phil Osborne <posborne@minuteman-ups.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:43:24 -0500; cones is social hour or anything, but it's a great way to get to know some of the racers whom I would not normally meet. -brad (ps: DG, thanx for the compelling topics! Brainstorming is always good.); /html/autox/1999-10/msg01129.html (9,671 bytes)
15. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:54:59 -0500; Jenaro Rodriguez offers: <snip> to work two run and his. There's nothing to stop you from doing that now. As long as you or your designated representative are present for your work assignment, your o; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01132.html (9,506 bytes)
16. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:05:25 -0500; AnalogMike sez: I'm in the same boat there. What would stop you from bringing a designated worker with you (paid or not, depending on what you work out with the individual) and having them work inste; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01133.html (10,336 bytes)
17. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: 94kart <94kart@nycap.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:17:52 -0400; I'm just returning to Autocross after a 20 year hiatus,(well actually my son is autocrossing his cage kart). Nothing appears to have changed. you may only get 6 mins of seat time but it's still the m; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01134.html (9,368 bytes)
18. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:14:19 -0700; I'm aware that when a"prima donna" driver shows up, s/he will get one of his/her "crew" to do the work for him. Probably no pay involved. We have a worker sign-up sheet, and at the end of the day, th; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01136.html (10,980 bytes)
19. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:52:41 -0700; FWIW, I have done this...but at a bit more cost. I have paid $20 for someone to work a run group. I can't speak for all High School age students, but a lot of them want more than $5/hour. If you look; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01137.html (10,396 bytes)
20. re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1): Author: Gemery@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 13:50:19 EDT; Corollary One: Know your intended audience so you avoid schedule conflicts. has On the rest of it, I don't want to sound too discouraging, but you need to address some more facts before attempting t; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01146.html (11,729 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]