Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+New\s+G\/Stock\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+New\s+G\/Stock\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. The New G/Stock (score: 1): Author: "Larry Steckel" <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 20:43:37 -0500; "G Stock floored me. It looks like they stripped everything out of the old D and E Stock and jammed them into G Stock which used to be a turbo class....I see one of two things happening in G Stock ne; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00214.html (7,542 bytes)
2. Re: The New G/Stock (score: 1): Author: "E. Martens" <emartenssprint@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 20:06:35 -0600; old to the It's a little early to tell I think.....G does'nt seem any worse off in this event than several others. If I had to pick I would go with the dog fight. Edwin Martens '99 G-Stock Camaro Wi; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00215.html (7,667 bytes)
3. Re: The New G/Stock (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <pullg@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 23:28:44 -0500; Last September, I estimated the competitive cars as "...V6 F-bodies, Probe/MX-6 twins, 4th gen non-VTEC Preludes, maybe the new RSX, CRX Si, Neons and if anyone finds some survivors, a Conquest Turbo; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00217.html (7,814 bytes)
4. Re: The New G/Stock (score: 1): Author: Mark Darby <markds33@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 21:09:44 -0800 (PST); Jamie, The diverse grouping of cars in this years G Stock will not JUST be a driver battle. Things like format(Pro or Nat), course design and even weather conditions are also going to play a part in; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00218.html (7,145 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]