Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stock\s+Classing\s+Idea\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stock\s+Classing\s+Idea\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Stock Classing Idea (score: 1): Author: "Andy Whittle" <awhittle@fastrans.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:33:54 -0600; Could it work to go to a 8 stock class format. AS Front Engine Rear Drive over 15 lbs/hp BS Rear Engine Rear Drive over 15 lbs/hp CS Front Engine Front Drive over 15 lbs/hp DS Four Wheel Drive over 1; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00203.html (7,614 bytes)
2. Re: Stock Classing Idea (score: 1): Author: "Richard Rees" <greyhawke@home.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:38:14 -0600; What about mid engine cars? And, while we're at it, my car can probably run in both FE/RD and midE/RD classes, because the engine is in the front, BUT the engine is entirely behind the front axles, s; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00204.html (8,224 bytes)
3. Re: Stock Classing Idea (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:44:18 EST; << Could it work to go to a 8 stock class format. AS Front Engine Rear Drive over 15 lbs/hp BS Rear Engine Rear Drive over 15 lbs/hp CS Front Engine Front Drive over 15 lbs/hp DS Four Wheel Drive ove; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00205.html (7,797 bytes)
4. Re: Stock Classing Idea (score: 1): Author: Paul Cezanne <oblique@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:10:06 -0500; or is it just mixes that are unusal by today's standards? We'll still have 8 "best" cars when the dust settles. pZ -- Paul Cezanne (formerly Czarnecki) Please consider buying my wife's new book, The; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00209.html (7,438 bytes)
5. Re: Stock Classing Idea (score: 1): Author: Paul Cezanne <oblique@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:08:59 -0500; This is too simple, it can't be good. :-) Why not? This way, we'll have 8 cars that are "Best" car according to the formula. Right now, we have 8 cars that are the "best" car according to the SEB. I; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00210.html (8,367 bytes)
6. Re: Stock Classing Idea (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:48:50 EST; << or is it just mixes that are unusal by today's standards? We'll still have 8 "best" cars when the dust settles. >> no, you'll have 8 classes that are very course dependent, for one thing... CHD; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00212.html (7,192 bytes)
7. Re: Stock classing idea (score: 1): Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 08:42:48 -0500; Instead of a best car for each class, we should strive to have as many cars as possible competitive in each class. A-stock is probably the best current example of that with the MR2T, 968, 944S2, S20; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00225.html (7,773 bytes)
8. Re: Stock classing idea (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 11:19:12 EST; And this is why we do it the way we do. The SCAC/SEB can more closely achieve this than can any mathematical formula. CHD; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00234.html (7,146 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]