- 1. Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:25:20 EST
- You guys... you are correct, but you are mistaken. Here is the problem... Street Mod rules clearly state (and I quote) "C. Street Modified The purpose of this class is to allow the maximum amount of
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00405.html (8,049 bytes)
- 2. Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' (score: 1)
- Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:06:56 -0600
- quote) creativity while maintaining streetability. The following modifications are allowed beyond those allowed for STR I understand perfectly well the stated purpose of the rules, even though it has
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00408.html (8,573 bytes)
- 3. Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:54:49 EST
- You guys... (Maybe Dennis can Clarify)... I don't have a 2000 rule book infront of me. But if My memory serves me correct, it says something to this effect under SM... "SM includes all mods listed pr
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00415.html (9,454 bytes)
- 4. Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:56:34 -0800
- I suspect the ultimate intent is to have TireRack print up license plates with their 800 number on them, for distribution to SM contestants at each venue. I agree with you, Jay - it's hypocritical i
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00432.html (8,471 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu