Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kumhos\,\s+shaved\s+vs\s+unshaved\s+performance\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kumhos\,\s+shaved\s+vs\s+unshaved\s+performance\?\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Kumhos, shaved vs unshaved performance?? (score: 1): Author: Dave Young <Young1Racing@home.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 20:23:43 -0700; Seeking data and/or opinions: How much quicker on a dry 60 second course (assume Topeka-like concrete!); shaved vs unshaved 'fresh' Kumhos???? Dave Young 94 Pontaic TA ESP AZ Region; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00498.html (6,636 bytes)
2. Re: Kumhos, shaved vs unshaved performance?? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:38:26 -0700; I don't have back to back test data with the Kumho's, but the BFG R1 was around ~0.4 seconds faster shaved on concrete than the full tread equivalent. I would assume the Kumho to be similar. --JCG --; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00516.html (7,198 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]