Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kuhmo\s+\-vs\-\s+Yokohama\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kuhmo\s+\-vs\-\s+Yokohama\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Kuhmo -vs- Yokohama (score: 1): Author: Bob Pariza <bpariza@excite.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:03:25 -0700 (PDT); Hello All, Does anyone have experience with both the Kuhmo and the Yokohama tires on something like a Camaro, and an opinion on which is better for that application? I'm not ready to spend yet, but I; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00346.html (7,086 bytes)
2. RE: Kuhmo -vs- Yokohama (score: 1): Author: "Randy Chase" <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:25:25 -0700; Between the Kumho and Yokohama, if you want ability to commute and a competitive tire for a Camaro, I would choose the Toyo Proxes RA-1. David Jansen in his Firebird (IIRC) did very well on those tir; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00348.html (7,463 bytes)
3. Re: Kuhmo -vs- Yokohama (score: 1): Author: "Tommy Regan" <tommyr@texas.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:39:14 -0500; Ditto to Randy's comments. He hit the nail on the head. Toyos are killer tires for an all-around race/commuter tire. Tommy Regan '85 Z28 CP #95 '95 GMC C1500 '70 MG Midget http://tommyr.home.texas.ne; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00350.html (8,304 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]