- 1. KUDOS to the PC at fort meyers (score: 1)
- Author: j g <notstock@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:07:22 -0800 (PST)
- I have to commend the PC at Ft meyers for not allowing political pressure to influence their handeling of the protest regarding the speed of the event. I was not there so cannot state any belief in t
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00110.html (7,324 bytes)
- 2. Re: KUDOS to the PC at fort meyers (score: 1)
- Author: "Chuck and Donna #42" <teampointless@britsys.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:49:31 -0500
- If nothing else this protest and the resolution seems to have produced the, I suspect, intended result of forcing the SEB to examine the speed/safety of course design issue as well as the ambiguity o
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00112.html (9,257 bytes)
- 3. Re: KUDOS to the PC at fort meyers (score: 1)
- Author: chass1@san.rr.com
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:33:49 -0800
- /var/spool/mqueue/: No such directory
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00114.html (6,643 bytes)
- 4. Re: KUDOS to the PC at fort meyers (score: 1)
- Author: "Chuck and Donna #42" <teampointless@britsys.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:07:49 -0500
- I was always under the impression it worked the other way around: That Nationals were the pinacle and set the model to strive towards. I'd hate to think that Joe Local who may have never been to a na
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00115.html (8,636 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu