Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Harness\s+bar\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Harness\s+bar\.\.\.\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: "Keath Marx" <larrybulk@marx.ws>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:45:38 -0400; I thought I read somewhere that mounting a bar to mount a harness to was legal for stock. Is that correct? I am looking at something like this: http://www.hardbar.net/page_hardbar.htm; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00046.html (7,293 bytes)
2. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:22:31 -0400; Yes, a harness bar is legal as long as it serves no other purpose. Softop cars cannot use a harness or torso strap without a rollbar above the helmet if it isn't a hardtop tho. -- Original Message --; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00049.html (7,987 bytes)
3. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@invisiblesun.org>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:24:37 -0700; Wow, haven't posted here in forever. Just a thought on the Harness Bar rule... How can a harness bar that is sturdy enough to function as a harness bar (that means it should support your weight at ab; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00066.html (8,146 bytes)
4. RE: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: "Keath Marx" <larrybulk@marx.ws>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:10:56 -0400; I agree whole heartedly. From the looks of this rule I don't think there is a way to put a harness in the car without worrying about getting protested in the future. I am not real keen on the chest s; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00068.html (7,855 bytes)
5. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:11:57 -0400; A harness installed using a harness bar alone is only allowed in AX in stock and street tire classes where the likelyhood of a significantly dangerous head on impact is nearly nill. It is is thus con; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00069.html (10,309 bytes)
6. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:25:52 -0400; The way the rules are currently written, you could put a piece of rope around the back of your seat and your hips and be legal, no other belts or harnesses needed. (To be more protest-proof, use a pi; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00075.html (9,206 bytes)
7. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:58:09 -0400; IMO Harnesses do provide a safety feature ESPECIALLY in stock class, but not from crashes which are unlikely, but from loss of control due to driver sliding out of position on the seat, quite likely.; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00076.html (10,140 bytes)
8. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:16:34 -0500; Oh, Boy! Now you've opened a Pandora's box, Mark -- even though I do agree with you. While we're at it, why don't we undo some of the other Stock "allowances" and make the class even more Stock?!?!?; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00078.html (8,558 bytes)
9. RE: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: "Keath Marx" <larrybulk@marx.ws>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:08:38 -0400; I didn't ask the question to start a religious war over whether the Harness Bar is Less Filling or Tastes Great. I am looking for a solution. I have seen a couple of ideas that I might try. Here is; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00080.html (8,289 bytes)
10. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:12:20 EDT; In your application, Z06 in SS, I know of quite a few folks who have run at a National level with the harness bar and never been protested ( to the best of my knowledge). I think this one is a non-st; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00081.html (7,700 bytes)
11. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: Scott Troyer - DDR TestEng <stroyer@micron.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:04:53 -0600; What about the use of poly spacers? Would that move you to an SP class? :-D; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00082.html (8,669 bytes)
12. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:02:08 -0500; I will disagree with you on this for one primary reason -- the widespread use of inertia reel belts in modern cars that do absolutely nothing for you until the accident has begun to happen. For what; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00087.html (10,617 bytes)
13. RE: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: "Charles R. Schultz" <k4cay@cableone.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:05:54 -0500; This reminds me of the first time (about a hundred years ago) that I autocrossed my diesel Rabbit, way back when it was still in EStock and I still lived in Glen region. . . Being fairly new to the s; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00088.html (8,685 bytes)
14. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1): Author: Scott Troyer - DDR TestEng <stroyer@micron.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:25:10 -0600; "Enough with the harness bar already. Get a room! " I'm not sure this was directed at me or at the list in general. I was just trying to lighten up the conversation and point out where the rubber sp; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00090.html (10,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]