Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Forwarded\:\s+clarifications\s+to\s+FM\s+exhaust\s+protest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Forwarded\:\s+clarifications\s+to\s+FM\s+exhaust\s+protest\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: List Administration <lists@autox.team.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:50:12 -0600 (MDT); For some reason this was sent to me rather than autox@autox.team.net. Reply to author, not me. mjb. -- Rocky commented on the exhaust pipe issue in Fmod pretty accurately but incompletely. It is impo; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00135.html (13,514 bytes)
2. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:04:17 EDT; You were not sent away from the event, but rather penalized for an obvious rule infraction. Your exhaust exceeded the very specific rule which set the length limit at a firm 24" from the rear axle ce; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00139.html (10,355 bytes)
3. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:26:38 -0400 (EDT); The part of this whole deal that I don't understand is why the penalty was so harsh. Let's face it, a DSQ or a 10 second penalty are _both_ essentially disqualifications. Given the nature of the pen; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00140.html (11,450 bytes)
4. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Nomad Trash" <NomadTrash@att.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:48:38 -0500; You are correct that the pipe length and shape has a big effect on power output on a two stroke. A three inch shorter pipe which would accomodate a silencer legally may have a big effect on power. I; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00141.html (8,626 bytes)
5. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:00:52 -0400 (EDT); But we _don't_ currently have a requirement for silencers. So the option is (apparently) to either not run one at all and be loud & legal, or to run one to keep the noise down, but you're open to a; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00144.html (9,079 bytes)
6. RE: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Haden" <bhaden@ucsd.edu>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:04:16 -0700; (Not to mention... Stingers can be removed in about 2 minutes with no effects. I fail to understand someone who chooses to protest their competitors rather than speak with them prior to their runs an; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00145.html (8,907 bytes)
7. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:05:29 -0400; Or run one in such a way that it complies with the packaging rules. Perhaps an elbow between the the pipe and muffler would have done it? What I don't completely understand is, if these competitors n; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00146.html (8,844 bytes)
8. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:27:41 -0500; option Probably because LOCAL rules are typically less fussy about such minutiae. The purpose there was to get quieter, and the competitors complied. I can see it a terribly easy thing to do, missing; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00156.html (9,963 bytes)
9. RE: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Paul Zahornasky" <p.zahornasky@att.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:56:25 -0400; Rule is in the GCR: E.15.b of the F500 rules: "Any exhaust pipe(s) may be used (unless otherwise specified), provided they meet a sound limit of 92db on the "A" scale measured fifty (50) feet behind; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00158.html (9,334 bytes)
10. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: pethier@isd.net; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:24:24 -0500; What I don't completely understand is why rules would be written to make silencing cars more difficult than it has to be when site acquisition and retention is the number one problem facing autocros; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00159.html (8,567 bytes)
11. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:25:46 EDT; Clarification: apparently they were originally DSQ, then one driver appealed and received a 10 sec penalty instead; the other driver figured his fate would be no better and decided not to appeal. App; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00163.html (9,536 bytes)
12. Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:12:39 -0500; This is quite true. However, there are many examples of rules that are important for safety in road-racing that are waived in Solo2. The requirement for mirrors, for example. I know Pat needs two mir; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00185.html (9,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]