- 1. Course speeds - was Ft Myers protests (score: 1)
- Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <pullg@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:35:10 -0500
- That's irrelevent to this issue, though. The issue is: what does the insurance policy say? I haven't looked at the SCCA's policy lately, but I've been helping a non-SCCA club set up some basic safety
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00070.html (8,638 bytes)
- 2. RE: Course speeds - was Ft Myers protests (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Salem" <ebsalem1@cox.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:53:10 -0600
- There's even a solution within the SCCA for your desires: the Solo Trials rules, and the club infrastructure backing them, were set up specifically to permit higher speed events. Yes, they come with
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00071.html (7,854 bytes)
- 3. RE: Course speeds - was Ft Myers protests (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:57:54 -0500
- That doesn't imply that the GS competitor was unaffected. The classing system works only within the parameters for which it was designed; if the course falls outside those parameters, the classing sy
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00072.html (7,677 bytes)
- 4. Re: Course speeds - was Ft Myers protests (score: 1)
- Author: "Chuck and Donna #42" <teampointless@britsys.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:01:31 -0500
- It happens that the driver in question is an evo instructor and one of the best driver's out there. It also happens that his class was in the first run group so he had first hand knowlege of the spee
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00073.html (9,791 bytes)
- 5. RE: Course speeds - was Ft Myers protests (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Kline" <solo2dmmr2@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:39:35 -0500
- Thanks for pointing out a, IMO, very important part of this higher speed discussion. The fact that when speeds such as this are allowed the classing system used for our events goes entirely out the
- /html/autox/2006-02/msg00087.html (8,256 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu