- 1. [evolution-disc.] (score: 1)
- Author: "Karl Rickert" <alfakarl@tds.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:30:35 -0600
-
- /html/autox/2004-04/msg00014.html (6,220 bytes)
- 2. Re: [evolution-disc.] (score: 1)
- Author: "Cheryl and Jim Fossum" <fossum@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:43:45 -0500
- Looking at this from a slightly different angle, I don't see how the EVO and STi can be in the same class as the WRX and DSMs that were presumably considered to be competetive with the F-bodies and M
- /html/autox/2004-01/msg00211.html (13,792 bytes)
- 3. Re: [evolution-disc.] (score: 1)
- Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:33:57 -0500
- Yet another good point..... Either the pony cars were not fast enough before to beat the WRX's and DSM's by enough, or the WRX an DSM were mis-classed (which at least with the DSM we know is untrue t
- /html/autox/2004-01/msg00212.html (7,033 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu