Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\?\!\?What\s+does\s+this\s+mean\?\!\?\!\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\?\!\?What\s+does\s+this\s+mean\?\!\?\!\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Kizerian" <davekizerian@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:51:00 -0600; "The SEB has approved a recommendation to offer STS as a supplemental class at the 2001 Solo II National Championships." Am I right in beleiving that this means STS is still not an oficial class for; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00874.html (7,497 bytes)
2. RE: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:21:34 -0500; And if so, why? After 2 years of meeting the "minimum" participation criteria why wouldn't one officially make it a Nationals class? Unless it's just another case of the Man trying to keep me down. ;; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00880.html (8,024 bytes)
3. Re: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: Jkinser77@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:25:03 EDT; << Am I right in beleiving that this means STS is still not an oficial class for 2001?!? >> I know it was not for this year an offical Nationals class, but this is for 2001 also? that doesn't seem ri; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00881.html (7,640 bytes)
4. Re: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Kizerian" <davekizerian@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:45:37 -0600; The Quote was directly off of the SCCA website.... http://www.scca.org/news/tech/seb/9-26-00.html class for reasoning?; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00883.html (8,221 bytes)
5. Fw: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:28:53 -0400; I don't know for sure, but if I were making the decision the tire rule would have to be a big consideration. . . . . Roger 2 -- Original Message --; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00892.html (8,545 bytes)
6. RE: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:48:17 -0500; Umm, what tire rule? There's already a crystal clear rule that all STS tires must have a minimum treadwear rating of 140 and a width no more than 225. STR gets referenced to the Stock Class tire rule; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00895.html (8,027 bytes)
7. Re: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Kizerian" <davekizerian@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:59:58 -0600; What tire rule would this be?!? The 140 tread rating or better rule? Dave K URSCCA; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00896.html (7,623 bytes)
8. RE: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: brandon.fetch@ey.com; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:55:14 -0500; STR gets referenced to the Stock Class tire rules. Does that mean that we Neon drivers CANNOT use the Hoosier autoX tire since it extends beyond the fender well of the car? It's my understanding that; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00897.html (8,428 bytes)
9. Re: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: Brian Berryhill <brianberryhill@flashmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:23:53 -0500; "Change the first part of 14.10.L to read "Any metal clutch assembly, metal flywheel, or metal torque converter that uses the standard attachment to the crankshaft may be used. Non-metallic friction; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00908.html (8,781 bytes)
10. Re: ?!?What does this mean?!?!? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:26:26 -0500; the Yes. Does not matter. Lightened stock flywheel is OK. Aluminum flywheel is OK. Titanium flywheel is OK. Fiberglass flywheel is prohibited. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa,; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00953.html (8,583 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]