Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:solo2@uswest.net: 164 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

61. Re: FW: miata????(Vette classing) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 12:05:12 -0700
Is that like "America's Football Team", the Dallas Cowboys? You know, flags waving in the background and America the Beautiful playing softly, as the Corvette cheerleaders flash their pom poms at all
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00039.html (6,964 bytes)

62. Re: C4 Vette Numbers (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 18:55:49 -0700
Check our events results more closely: http://www.autocrossing.com/cgibin/results.cgi That's the average Ladies SSL class number - add to that the Open SS, Pax/L, BSP/L, Street Tire and Novice Vettes
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00090.html (7,238 bytes)

63. Re: kumho crack - owner (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 16:51:01 -0700
What did Kumho say? Have you asked them? Scott Meyers
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00245.html (7,268 bytes)

64. Re: kumho crack - owner (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 16:58:29 -0700
I'm running 225x50x15 Kumhos on a 6"x15" rim, and find I need 55# front pressure to keep the tires stable enough to work. I had started at 42# to 44#, and the wear characteristics were not good - ver
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00246.html (7,423 bytes)

65. Re: C4 Vette Heaven (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 08:18:21 -0700
Paul, In Arizona we started providing some 'specialty' classes and the SCCA Open classes now account for only 33% of our cars. The Paxed classes, Novice and Street Tire classes take the other 67%. Ma
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00297.html (7,258 bytes)

66. Re: re : New Toyota Celica GTS - sighting (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 15:02:47 -0700
Its not just you - I will not buy a motorcycle engine hidden in a cars body. I do wonder if the MX-6 or Probe are indeed dead on some courses - I suggest not. After watching some Type R's run, the ol
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00353.html (7,422 bytes)

67. Re: C4 Vette (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 15:07:14 -0700
While you are at it, also check the percentage of those drivers who still attend in all other classes and see if the Corvette crew are more or less than the norm - otherwise the figures would be mean
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00355.html (8,522 bytes)

68. Re: RX7 vs. Corvette (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 15:27:10 -0700
-- Rumor has it that a National level driver will be deveoping the newest C5 Corvette next year, a 2000 model. (Is C5 the right terminology for the new body style?). If he is succesful, won't all the
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00362.html (7,337 bytes)

69. Re: C4 vs Competition (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 09:54:02 -0700
As with other cars in other classes, not all cars in one class are on the same "equal potential" line. In each class, on any given day, there will be certain cars whose attributes align very well wit
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00457.html (7,550 bytes)

70. Nationals Is Only One Place To Race (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 15:10:41 -0700
I'm glad that you, too, realize that there is life both after and away from the Nationals. Scott Remember, this is an E Stock car next year :-)
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00495.html (6,830 bytes)

71. Re: S2000 current/future owners (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 16:48:26 -0700
-- Hey - are those Yokohamas on that car? With the weird tread pattern? Scott Meyers Did you guys know that if you do and extra 'shift' when typing that C4 comes out to be C$ ??? An accident? I think
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00506.html (7,063 bytes)

72. Re: Tires (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 19:58:25 -0700
-- I was told that SOME of the BFG wins were on 'saved for the occasion' R-1's....... Sounds like a 'farce' to me! ;-) Scott Meyers
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00516.html (7,472 bytes)

73. Re: SWAY BARS???? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:28:01 -0700
I thought he meant to allow one end of the car or the other, but not both. I would favor that. **This to go along with the existing $1000 to $1700 (as reported in this list) necessary for special sho
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00640.html (9,333 bytes)

74. Re: SWAY BARS???? and more! (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:26:44 -0700
Hey - how about: * no spacers * factory stock shocks (no more trouble to check that what we have now for other things - like washers? :-) * factory stock sway bars * factory stock wheels - didn't com
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00675.html (7,387 bytes)

75. Re: SWAY BARS???? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 07:42:28 -0700
Just build one adjustable bar, and fine tune from there! A custom adjustable bar for front or rear would be far less than $800 - unless you own a Porsche and are used to such expenditures ;-) Sometim
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00702.html (8,426 bytes)

76. Re: swaybar info(2) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:58:05 -0700
I've seen a number of concerns, issues and questions raised by experienced folks here. BTW, I'm sitting here looking at my very first SCCA "Solo I & II Rules" book, circa 1976, and I've got one for e
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00746.html (9,717 bytes)

77. Re: swaybar info(3) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 20:41:32 -0700
Most MR-2's (rd) NA use a much larger front bar. My 240 SX (rd) could use a larger REAR bar. While it might not "be broke", perhaps it isn't as applicable today as then. Kinda like a lot of other thi
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00762.html (6,733 bytes)

78. Re: Different slant on Sway-Bars (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:07:27 -0700
I was speaking to a long time road racer about these shocks (are they called 'reservoir' shocks?), and he was surprised that they were allowed in stock classes. In his experience it is well accepted
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00803.html (8,163 bytes)

79. Re: Camber kit question (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:22:03 -0700
-- My local Nissan dealer does not know about or carry "Crash Bolts". The only allowable fix is replacement of damaged parts. Damn! Scott Meyers
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00880.html (8,731 bytes)

80. Re: High $ shock setups (was Different slant on Sway-Bars) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 15:18:28 -0700
Thanks Mark for the additional information. Perhaps those that have trouble are the ones using their bump stops as part of their suspension :-) ? I'm wondering how some are able to get their cars low
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00899.html (8,632 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu