- 241. Re: Proposed SP suspension rule for 2003 (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:18:47 EST
- There are several racks available in Topeka, I'm sure. In the event of a protest, part of the teardown bond would be the cost of the alignment. As always, the specs in your factory shop manual (which
- /html/autox/2002-03/msg00516.html (8,640 bytes)
- 242. Re: Proposed SP suspension rule for 2003 (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 01:43:19 EST
- As was mentioned previously, this is an additional allowance, not an additional limitation. Cars using this allowance are not limited to factory alignment specs, it's just that the newly allowed shim
- /html/autox/2002-03/msg00521.html (9,225 bytes)
- 243. Re: Proposed SP suspension rule for 2003 (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:18:05 EST
- Okay, here's an example. The rear toe on an Omni GLH is specified in the factory shop manual to be adjustible by means of shims. This allows the car to achieve toe out beyond factory specs by factory
- /html/autox/2002-03/msg00525.html (8,965 bytes)
- 244. Re: 800 lb. foot in mouth (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:28:36 EST
- I think of most American cars as having 5, German cars being about 50/50 between 4 and 5, and Italian cars as having 4, it's the French that use 3... Charlie Davis /// unsubscribe/change address requ
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00033.html (7,486 bytes)
- 245. Re: Seeking opinions from Left Foot Brakers (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 03:17:42 EST
- My feet are 11 1/2, and I've LFBed Civics since about '77. I like mocassins in tight footwells. I get mocassin kits from Tandy Leather stores ($8.95?) and sew them up myself... I won't be using them
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00049.html (8,158 bytes)
- 246. Re: So, how's the weather.... (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 00:37:35 EST
- Man, it's gorgeous out here! I saw the greatest sunset last night on my way to my girlfriend's house... medium blue sky, getting lighter toward the horizon, through orange into pink, the Pacific ocea
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00089.html (7,695 bytes)
- 247. Re: So, how's the weather.... (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 15:42:45 EST
- And Jeff responded: Oh, and did I mention the fires, lack of drainage and resultant mudslides? Yeah, it's a horrible place to live, you wouldn't want to come here! But that sunset WAS awesome! CHD //
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00175.html (7,815 bytes)
- 248. Chris Sharpe e-mail address (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:37:40 EST
- Chris, please get in toouch with me. Or, if someone has an address, I'd appreciate it. Charlie Davis /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00205.html (6,605 bytes)
- 249. Chris Sharpe e-mail address (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:37:57 EST
- Chris, please get in toouch with me. Or, if someone has an address, I'd appreciate it. Charlie Davis /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00206.html (6,624 bytes)
- 250. Re: Z28 to ESP (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 11:59:33 EST
- The boxed lower control arms are not allowed in ESP, nor are the subframe connectors. The strut brace is only legal if it doesn't triangulate to the firewall. Charlie Davis /// unsubscribe/change add
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00315.html (7,138 bytes)
- 251. Re: Undecided (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 23:26:24 EST
- A GSL-SE will get beaten, a GSL will get soundly beaten, and you don't even have an LSD, so in ES, you have very little chance of doing well, unfortunately... And CSP requires a lot of $$$... Maybe d
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00551.html (7,265 bytes)
- 252. Pratt Cole? (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:43:31 EST
- Hi. I need an e-mail address for autocrosser/roadracer Pratt Cole. Charlie /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Part
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00029.html (6,265 bytes)
- 253. Re: Nissan Announces Z Pricing (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:44:19 EST
- How much for the optional good looking front end? Charlie /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at h
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00089.html (7,053 bytes)
- 254. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: SP rules (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:26:08 EST
- Is someone recommending that we specify "stock" shocks on Stock category cars? I've got a bunch of arguements to THAT one! Charlie Davis /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.tea
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00148.html (7,908 bytes)
- 255. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: SP rules (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:52:38 EST
- Ding, Ding, Ding!!! Give that man a cigar! That's exactly the problem. Then, when I protest Scotty's "stock appearing shocks" we have to cut one each of his front and rear shocks apart and measure al
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00154.html (9,400 bytes)
- 256. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: SP rules (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:22:21 EST
- I agree that we should endeavor to control costs. I feel that a stock shock rule is 1) too restrictive, 2) dangerous unless we change the stock tire allowances to go along with it, 3) excludes someon
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00157.html (10,273 bytes)
- 257. Re: Stock Shock Rules rewrite? (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:32:30 EST
- I'm not convinced that SP, Prep and Mod cars aren't lagging behind Stock because most of us have already spent a ton on our cars and that the benefits aren't as obvious. Ask Frank Stagnaro, Barry Spe
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00159.html (9,176 bytes)
- 258. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: SP rules (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:35:10 EST
- One of my big objections is that with today's sticky tires, we'll have a lot of cars on their lids with OE shocks. Charlie /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00160.html (8,821 bytes)
- 259. Re: Stock Shock Rules rewrite? Part 3 (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 23:34:54 EST
- Uh, that rule is in SP, not Stock. The only wording that might be used is on Pg. 89 of the '01 rule book, in the opening section of Section 13. It allows "normally expendable components" to be replac
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00173.html (7,614 bytes)
- 260. Re: Stock shock rules rewrite? (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:26:16 EST
- This has been bandied about for years, and usually dismissed as unworkable. I think it's "less unworkable" than stock shocks with sticky tires. Another thing that would help in regulating "stock shoc
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00185.html (8,748 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu