Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rnichol1@san.rr.com: 128 ]

Total 128 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Braided Steel Brake Lines on 92+ cars. (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 06:09:28 -0700
"Substitution of clutch and brake hydraulic lines with solid metal or braided metal is allowed on all cars manufctured before MY 1992." Origin of the rule? Good reason for it? Dunno. Street Prepared
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00618.html (8,050 bytes)

42. Re: flyin mercedes (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:45:32 -0700
Ja, high speed cable netted a 10 minute download time, on background, but wouldn't display the movie. Nice try, though, thanks anyway! My wife saw it on the news and was most impressed (and she doesn
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00685.html (8,787 bytes)

43. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again. (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:27:57 -0700
Good new/bad news, huh? BTW, thanks for including the actual rules, for those of us who don't get FasTrack (and as I recall, the website's only updated at the end of the issue month). Good news indee
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00722.html (9,406 bytes)

44. Re: Hey Karl (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:49:53 -0700
Oh, boy, we get to argue about, er, I mean, discuss turbos again! One of my favorite subjects. isn't possible in ESP If the point is, turbocars can't generate 24 psi with ESP legal mods, then I'll be
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00768.html (8,596 bytes)

45. Re: ST @ Nationals - current rules.....? (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 11:54:32 -0700
Speaking of which, does this latest issue of FasTrack address the proposed changes to SP, to add FSP and move some or all of the ESP cars to it? Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr.com San Diego, Califo
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00784.html (7,320 bytes)

46. Re: civic wheel/tire advice (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 12:55:49 -0700
Couldn't have looked too hard, here's one I found on the first page of my first search (for my daughter's Civic, about a month ago): http://www.capitalwheels.com/ Specialize in takeoffs, and are in
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00789.html (7,345 bytes)

47. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 15:32:37 -0700
Nah, you don't need a fire suit. I've been trying to tell people this for decades (though in that time, I'm up from a 2.0 to a 2.3, so I guess that means I'll be less in demand on the dating circuit)
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00804.html (8,349 bytes)

48. Re: NO! BUY A CAR FROM ME! 98 CAMARO 1LE...MUCH BETTER (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 21:25:36 -0700
Don't know Jackie, but surely she's worth more than a mere Vette -- try to get a better trade. ;) Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr.com San Diego, California, USA
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00829.html (7,041 bytes)

49. turbocars and supercars (was 'screwed again') (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 21:55:55 -0700
I can appreciate what you all are up against, having founded and operated international sporting events myself (now in their 22nd year, I believe). And I also am very appreciative of the decision you
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00831.html (9,162 bytes)

50. Re: More turbo rules stuff (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 07:30:17 -0700
When I install a blow-off or bypass valve on my SVO as part of my "intercoolers and manifolds are unrestricted" compliance, I promise not to change it thereafter. :) On another topic, the Camarobird
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00848.html (7,473 bytes)

51. Re: Turbo guys and Parity (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 10:06:56 -0700
turbo Mustangs & SVO is listed on the same line as V8). Time for some Listers to study up on the thermodynamics of automotive turbochargers! Have a $100 bill here that says it can't be done. :) The S
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00866.html (8,536 bytes)

52. Re: H & T revisited (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 07:49:20 -0700
Though I make no pretenses at being a world-class autoxer, I will claim to be pretty fair at so-called "heel and toe" on the street and on the track. I use the left edge of my shoe/foot for the brake
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01070.html (10,656 bytes)

53. Re: ST @ Nationals (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:35:34 -0700
Judy, I believe he meant "looser" the way it was spelled, not the way you took it (loser)! :] "Looser", as in "less tight". Certainly that's how it looks contextually. Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01102.html (8,497 bytes)

54. Turbotag (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:09:18 -0700
I autox a turbocar, so I get to comment on the update/backdate thread! :] Will admit I haven't been following the latest thread very carefully, 'cause my own car isn't affected by the proposed rule i
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01294.html (8,619 bytes)

55. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:13:53 -0700
Without having read the details of this post, I'll have to say that philosophically and strategically, I agree with the notion of a super street class (which I've proposed in another way, in the past
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01635.html (10,605 bytes)

56. Re: wasting gates (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 09:39:14 -0700
This thread isn't stirring up a lot of interest, but I'm still interested, so here goes: (PS -- that's the CCaannaaddiiaann spelling of "Nichols" <grin>.) I was really making a personal note about au
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00011.html (11,302 bytes)

57. Re: Alignment questions (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 13:31:13 -0700
Hi, Rex, you asked: I'm guessing you're autoxing one of the Beretta in your sig line, which I always assumed was RWD, but if you have a toe adjustment at the rear, too, guess not. Personally, on all
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00013.html (8,738 bytes)

58. Re: wasting gates (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 07:03:30 -0700
Good post. However, two points (listed as one) are deserving of correction from a technical standpoint: the and Boths of these points are misperceptions in and of themselves, and worth clarifying for
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00040.html (8,554 bytes)

59. Re: wasting gates (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 08:08:58 -0700
We can agree on that. That's why I keep saying things like this: because I understand that (and you maybe thought I kept repeating the word "SVO" to brag, huh?) <grin> curve look like on this car? F
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00049.html (8,952 bytes)

60. Re: wasting gates (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 21:48:07 -0700
Our math agrees completely on this -- my target is 10 and I'm at 12, and so I mispoke. Getting closer, maybe, parity, no. Thanks for the remind. Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr.com San Diego, Califo
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00116.html (7,698 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
This search system is powered by Namazu