Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mark@sirota.org: 120 ]

Total 120 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Course speeds - was Ft Myers protests (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:57:54 -0500
That doesn't imply that the GS competitor was unaffected. The classing system works only within the parameters for which it was designed; if the course falls outside those parameters, the classing sy
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00072.html (7,677 bytes)

2. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:34:34 -0500
--On February 22, 2006 12:27:57 AM -0800 Alan Dahl <alandahl@mac.com> Alan, are you talking about the spread between HS and SS, or HS and AM, or FJr and AM? I'm not sure I agree; I have Nationals res
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00120.html (8,232 bytes)

3. Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:04:23 -0500
Jay (or anyone else who feels like putting their math skills to use): What is the minimum radius seen in a slalom? Let's assume a 66" wide car, 12" wide pylons all in a line on a flat surface, evenly
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00122.html (11,060 bytes)

4. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:13:24 -0500
--On February 22, 2006 10:31:16 AM -0800 Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com> I agree completely, Katie. I was only concerned with Alan's assertion about the spread between slow and fast; I claim the sl
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00133.html (8,342 bytes)

5. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:58:29 -0500
This is gonna sound nasty, though it really isn't meant that way... This discussion should have been out of bounds for Danny. His column is supposed to be about ProSolo, not political commentary on t
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00173.html (10,276 bytes)

6. Re: Grassroots DOT article (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:56:24 -0500
For anyone who wishes to read the actual text of FMVSS 139 (49CFR571.139), it is available here from the National Archives: Text: <http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=49&PART=57
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00204.html (7,540 bytes)

7. Re: Matt's question on Street tires (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:11:04 -0500
I can't believe I'm going to waste my time saying this, but... Ben, please try to understand: There are a great many people who disagree with you on the point I quoted above. Repeating for emphasis:
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00237.html (9,345 bytes)

8. Re: Got Sirota PAX analysis? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:57:23 -0500
--On December 26, 2005 12:19:42 AM -0800 teamnet <teamnet@hedlygoeke.com> I'm sure we both forgot all about it. I'll put it on my to-do list... Mark __________________________________________________
/html/autox/2006-01/msg00005.html (7,299 bytes)

9. Re: Harness bar... (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:25:52 -0400
The way the rules are currently written, you could put a piece of rope around the back of your seat and your hips and be legal, no other belts or harnesses needed. (To be more protest-proof, use a pi
/html/autox/2005-08/msg00075.html (9,206 bytes)

10. Re: ax-digest V1 #1649 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:39:10 -0400
You're debating with the wrong guy when it comes to C&C. Harness are driver performance aids, not C&C. It's more comfortable to be in a seat with proper bolsters, too... If asked why you want harness
/html/autox/2005-08/msg00079.html (7,652 bytes)

11. Re: Protesting parts at local events (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 10:17:06 -0400
You're aware that by the National rules, gutted interiors are not allowed in SM, right? Not that Badlands can't choose to override that for local competition, of course. Mark ________________________
/html/autox/2005-05/msg00035.html (8,341 bytes)

12. Re: Need autocross video to d/l today... (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:01:12 -0400
Here's a remarkably good illustration of how autocross works (not sure if this has made the rounds already, I've been a bit out of touch): <http://www.vmsc.org/fun/May12_with_sound.html> Kudos to who
/html/autox/2005-05/msg00052.html (7,842 bytes)

13. Re: Paging Chuck Vobril of the MAC (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:32:18 -0500
Chuck Voboril <cvoboril@msn.com> Mark ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information
/html/autox/2005-03/msg00023.html (7,232 bytes)

14. Re: AP proposal in NAP (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:18:01 -0500
Without, as is indicated in that same section of the proposal. Right, but a built AP car will likely be putting out considerably more power from a motor of the same size. Like, probably double. Yes.
/html/autox/2005-03/msg00044.html (8,001 bytes)

15. Re: AP proposal in NAP (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:21:55 -0500
Right. That's true in every class that has minimum weights that weighs without driver (all of Prepared). That's why the MAC pushed through weighing with driver for DM/EM. The AP Committee wanted to s
/html/autox/2005-03/msg00049.html (7,916 bytes)

16. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Way to finance our Solo2..... (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:38:33 -0500
While it's a little off topic, I just wanted to remind folks that one of the several drivers for the Nation Tour program was to address the massive spread of event size and quality across Divisionals
/html/autox/2005-03/msg00098.html (9,281 bytes)

17. Re: Fw: SCCA Club Racing Announces New Entry Level Track (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:10:20 -0500
--On Friday, February 18, 2005 9:41 AM -0500 Chuck <golden1@britsys.net> Conspiracy theories always abound, but this is not the thinking behind moving the Solo 1 program to Club Racing. The fact is t
/html/autox/2005-02/msg00052.html (9,587 bytes)

18. Re: Classing available... Now Nomenclature (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:00:35 -0500
--On Monday, February 28, 2005 12:50 AM -0600 Eric Salem <ebsalem1@cox.net> Eric, see the AP proposal in the April Fastrack. It's close to this. Mark _________________________________________________
/html/autox/2005-02/msg00150.html (7,636 bytes)

19. Re: STS Tires and down memory lane (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:24:01 -0500
http://images8.fotki.com/v139/photos/4/438397/1675694/LWL_Porsche_Old_12x10- vi.jpg Is that a loudspeaker mounted to the back of the car? Did he call the events from the driver's seat? Mark _________
/html/autox/2005-01/msg00010.html (7,889 bytes)

20. Re: 2005 Helmet Rules (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:58:29 -0500
I'm pretty sure no formal decision has been made yet, but the last discussions I remember said that the Snell 90 helmets would probably be good through 2005, because the 2005 standard isn't to become
/html/autox/2005-01/msg00018.html (8,460 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu