Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kstevens@ventritex.com: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Traction control and ABS in S/P (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 10:38:13 -0700
I wonder if the reaction to ABS would be different if it were advertised as "individual automatic brake bias control" instead... KeS
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00082.html (9,230 bytes)

2. RE: Traction control and ABS in S/P (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 10:43:41 -0700
And, pray tell, which of you "above average" autocrossers uses "stomping on the brake" as a performance driving technique? What happened to the third test, where he modulated the brakes normally and
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00084.html (9,255 bytes)

3. RE: Traction control and ABS in S/P (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 10:50:20 -0700
Probably not - most traction control systems I know of have a defeat switch available. Since that's provided by the manufacturer, it is clearly legal to compete with traction control disabled. Pulli
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00086.html (9,573 bytes)

4. RE: Traction control and ABS in S/P (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:22:02 -0700
Ah, thanks very much. There you go. Let me answer that question with another: If you have a faulty turbo wastegate which you haven't gotten around to replacing, which provides an additional 4 lbs of
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00093.html (9,733 bytes)

5. RE: Left foot braking (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 12:16:36 -0700
Yah. Current, '99 Corvette, SS; prior, '89 Corvette, SS; '94 Camaro, ESP. braking Not for me. My goal in LFB is NOT to be actively applying throttle and brake at the same time, it's to make the tran
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00212.html (9,110 bytes)

6. RE: flyin mercedes (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:32:14 -0700
It isn't blank, though it may be corrupt. Here's the info from the first part of the byte stream: RIFFp^¸ AVI LIST¶ hdrlavih8 ì (tm)b ñ @ ð LIST| strlstrh@ vidsVCR1 ì @B ñ ÿÿÿÿ strf(
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00690.html (8,722 bytes)

7. RE: Is ballast legal in stock? (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:21:30 -0700
If you show up at Nationals with 150 lbs of *anything* in the right rear of your Camaro, and proceed to do well in FS or ESP, expect to be protested and lose. Cars HAVE been pitched for running wate
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00762.html (8,868 bytes)

8. RE: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 15:55:54 -0700
...and those LS1s lose 1 1/2 car lengths to the AWD cars coming out of every slow turn (about .3 - .4 sec. at the finish line). Take a snapshot of any Pro Solo start if you don't believe it. to peni
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00808.html (9,096 bytes)

9. FW: Re: Turbo Update/Backdate - A Solution (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:33:14 -0700
Josh - I think what's unclear and uncomfortable, at least to me, is how the process is *supposed* to work. For example, last year I sent a letter requesting a rule clarification to Denver, addressed
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01336.html (11,308 bytes)

10. RE: Subject: Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 14:41:17 -0700
That's not really the point, though. The point is that SCCA Solo II is sold to insurance vendors, participants, and site purveyors as having certain risk characteristics. One of those is a speed lim
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00090.html (7,839 bytes)

11. RE: Anti-rollbar theory? (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 16:00:52 -0700
When you adjust swaybars you are adjusting the percentage (not amount) of weight transfer from the inside tire patch to the outside. In your example, the larger front bar transfers more of the weigh
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00274.html (7,850 bytes)

12. RE: SP vs. Stock for street tire (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:39:28 -0700
http://www.sfrscca.com/solo2/Results/1998/index.html and look at the regular season Street Tire results up through round 12. This reflects some of the problems inherent in this whole "level the playi
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00485.html (9,789 bytes)

13. RE: Old Age (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 15:21:12 -0700
You're only young once, but you can be immature all your life! The world is divided betwixt those of us who find this reassuring, and those who find it alarming. KeS
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00338.html (7,256 bytes)

14. RE: PSI Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 16:41:11 -0700
Personally, I stop at a gas station near the event site, and air them up to above what I know I'll want to start first runs at once they cool down. Then I air them down to first run pressures on gri
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00674.html (8,485 bytes)

15. RE: finishing order (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:40:47 -0700
Or, your competitor beat everyone in the class; you beat no one in the KeS BTW, heard this snippet on the radio here in PC San Francisco. One of the local school systems has begun not keeping score f
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01067.html (8,033 bytes)

16. RE: Saftey, Was closed vs. open car thing (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 13:22:25 -0700
very good >reasons. Saftey engineering has changed our sport from one where people used to >watch expecting death and mayhem to one of the fastest growing spectator sports >in the country. You can e
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01475.html (7,255 bytes)

17. RE: Heel Toe [was: Integra AutoXing] (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:56:01 -0700
This is even sicker than Katie's Cliniqual experiments. KeS
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01599.html (8,380 bytes)

18. RE: Stock class for Firehawk (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 13:14:02 -0800
I know it's not a direct response to your (quite valid) question, but isn't it a moot point? Why would you prefer to run in SS rather than ESP? KeS
/html/autox/1999-03/msg00589.html (8,399 bytes)

19. RE: Stock class for Firehawk (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 13:31:26 -0800
The f-bodies aren't a problem in SP - they have essentially the same types of modifications from the factory that would be allowed in ESP anyway, and fit right in. I view them as being conservativel
/html/autox/1999-03/msg00592.html (8,454 bytes)

20. RE: New car classifications (score: 1)
Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 16:58:56 -0800
with Another way to phrase that is: "Have a model year cutoff for Stock classes". I'm all for it! ;) KeS
/html/autox/1999-03/msg00947.html (8,422 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu