Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jhadler@rmi.net: 280 ]

Total 280 documents matching your query.

61. Repost: Runoffs and Conemashers. --- SPOILERS ---- !!! (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 13:12:46 -0700
Ok. one more time, for some reason something's not allowing the blank spaces through... Ok, For those of you who are taping the races, don't read this!!! Delete it now!!! Matt Murray has been feeding
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00563.html (7,577 bytes)

62. Re: Mounting 5-point harness in a '99 Miata (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:02:49 -0700
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this yet, but you can't run a harness in an open top car without a GCR rollbar or cage installed in the car. Of course, this only applies to SCCA sanctioned event
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00733.html (9,942 bytes)

63. Re: Sway Bars (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 15:48:21 -0700
And how much of that stress can you attribute to the sway bar and not the tires? And NO. I'm not starting another blasted street tire debate again... -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hool
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00825.html (7,050 bytes)

64. Re: Mounting 5-point harness in a '99 Miata (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 22:46:00 -0600
Phil is right on the money there. I was distracted by another very similar conversation where Solo Trials and Solo1 were being discussed, and there you DO need a GCR legal bar. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadle
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00922.html (8,484 bytes)

65. Re: Appearance kits: sp legal? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 13:46:20 -0700
Getting back on track a bit, substitution of factory bumper with an aftermarket (not originally equipped on that model or models of car) one is patently not legal. However, the addition of an air dam
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01278.html (9,694 bytes)

66. Re: Appearance kits: sp legal? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 16:51:04 -0700
Not that brake ducts really matter at all for autox, but they are legal in SP. I don't particularly think of myself as a Honda guy at all. But I've gotten pretty good at identifying Honda CRX's by ye
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01291.html (9,385 bytes)

67. Re: Sway Bars (more!) (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 17:00:15 -0700
Why can't you have it to allow "one end or the other" even in the event that is allows one to be added on? I know that it creates a car that was never available that way. But so too does adding a fro
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01293.html (9,264 bytes)

68. Re: Novice advice (a short novel) (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 13:53:43 -0700
[snip] [snip] This was perfectly said! Especially from the perspective of someone who was just there. If there were a FAQ, this post should be included in it! I know that it's not terribly glamorous
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01455.html (8,815 bytes)

69. Re: Novice advice (a short novel) (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 14:02:34 -0700
So I see!! :-) Cool! It's already been bookmarked... But this FAQ is really targeted to the first timer, not to the person who's been autoxing for a little while though. Questions like the street tir
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01458.html (8,138 bytes)

70. Re: Poly Bushing motor mount inserts (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:05:41 -0700
Yes it would. As a matter of fact, anything other than OEM motor and/or tranny mounts are considered "solid". You can install a single torque suppression device though, and that can help alot. Yupers
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01518.html (8,359 bytes)

71. Re: Stock Class Wheel regs (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 14:20:22 -0700
Actually, there are allowances: "No portion of the tread may extend beyond the fender opening when viewed from the top perpendicular to the ground. In those cases where the original equipment is such
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01595.html (8,306 bytes)

72. Re: Stock Class Wheel regs (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 16:00:46 -0700
Well I can imagine. But still, you can only fit so much tire on a given rim width anyway. One look at the little stock Hondas (215's on a 5" rim) or the current crop of DSM cars and they're pretty mu
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01600.html (8,099 bytes)

73. Re: I'm part of the 900! (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:13:53 -0700
1. Josh hadler 2. jhadler@rmi.net 3. Boulder, CO 4. A-Stock, Toyota MR2 turbo, Tue/Wed 5. Arrive 12th, Depart 18th 6. Amerisuites 7. I think I'll leave any questions about underwear out of this.... -
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00090.html (9,024 bytes)

74. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 22:11:51 -0600
Hey now, watch it! I'd say there are three, maybe even four manufacturers that are in easy contention for the A-Stock trophy this year. Porsche (968, 944S2) BMW (M3, Z3) Toyota (MR2-turbo) and... TVR
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00346.html (9,301 bytes)

75. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 22:31:21 -0600
Whoops!! <red faced embarassment>... I really thought that the TVR had been plopped into A-Stock. Geez, what kind of rock have -I- been living under? Please pardon the silliness of my last post then.
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00348.html (9,512 bytes)

76. Re: was New GS, now Class killerz (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1999 02:18:41 -0600
Unfortunately, any competitive advantage gained from reduced air resistance is lost and then some by the decreased air density going into the engine. Less air, less power. Give me the white car in th
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00357.html (8,665 bytes)

77. Re: Event at Hallett (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 16:28:24 -0700
Or madly trying to finish that document that needs to be done before you leave... Holy cow! What am I doing? gotta get back to work so I can have fun next week... -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00578.html (7,455 bytes)

78. Re: We're heading out! (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 13:45:10 -0700
'cause I'm still trying to finnish this @$#% report! I'm almost done, and then I'm outta here for over a week! -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum S
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00610.html (6,746 bytes)

79. See ya!! (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 17:03:24 -0700
Finally! Done! For those of you headin' out to Topeka, see ya there! For those of you doing better things with your time... I'll make sure to mash a cone just for you, and maybe also hoist a few... -
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00611.html (6,479 bytes)

80. Re: Katie Kelly protested? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 10:30:12 -0700
With a comment like that, would -you- want to speak up? Probably not. I dunno, I've only heard one side of the story, and I'll admit that having only heard that side it sounded weird to me. But I (an
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00944.html (9,316 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu