Mail Archive Search: <+from:jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jemitchelltx@earthlink.net: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

41. Re: U/B in ST (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 12:34:46 -0500; I've asked for clarification from the SEB as well, although my second request relates more to the February Fastrack Technical Bulletin than to U/B in general. the rest of We're in agreement there. It; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00164.html (8,039 bytes)
42. Re: U/B in ST (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 12:29:06 -0500; sunroof whatever) Weel, you can stop right there. IF the factory manual specifies "how such a swap is done," then performing the swap will result in the car being "as specificed by the manufacturer,"; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00165.html (7,956 bytes)
43. Re: 1972 BMW 2002 Classing (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 06:59:38 -0500; checks out, but US-market 1972 BMW 2002s came from the factory with a single-barrel Solex carburetor, an engine-driven "smog pump," and an exhaust manifold with air inlets for each cylinder .The odds; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00178.html (9,609 bytes)
44. Re: 1972 BMW 2002 Classing (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 11:03:50 -0500; Yes, and that model was never sold in the US due to noncompliance with our emissions regulations. US that had 5spd I am confident that the above statement is incorrect. If any 5-speed 2002s made it i; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00183.html (8,418 bytes)
45. Re: 1972 BMW 2002 Classing (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:14:46 -0500; to make STS I certainly never made such a claim. I said exactly the opposite, and this is an excellent example of what I had in mind. Jay; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00194.html (7,964 bytes)
46. Re: [evolution-disc.] Update Question (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:14:01 -0600; its legal. No. There is no ambiguity about this. It was specifically made illegal sometime back in the mid-90s, and the current wording of the rules makes this clear. You can perform an "option packa; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00272.html (8,257 bytes)
47. Re: Autocross on Wikipedia (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:58:33 -0500; Here's a quote from that entry: "Unlike most motorsports (whose top ranks are heavily televised) the upper echelon of autocross - SCCA ProSolo has been badly mismanaged by the sanctioning body, who p; /html/autox/2006-04/msg00028.html (8,021 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 47
Page: [1] [2] [3]