- 101. Re: Conquest to GS (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 17:54:48 -0500
- Unfortunately, that philosophy will increase the generic nature of autocrossing. Neons in D, Miatas in B, Celicas in E, etc. Why not take a little time annually and move the cars that most people can
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg00470.html (8,441 bytes)
- 102. Re: Honda S2000 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:31:42 -0500
- So, it's going to SS and not AS? I'd bet against it in SS, but I think it would be a very good AS car. Kent Rafferty
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg00622.html (7,639 bytes)
- 103. Re: A Friday Physics Problem (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:10:51 -0500
- I'll need to poll the audience or call a friend... :-) Kent Rafferty out the care. we same velocity V. momentum of the same a uneffected, the
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg00867.html (9,209 bytes)
- 104. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 16:40:11 -0500
- Sorry Lee, you'll have to sell the car and find something else to run......no wait! I kinda like seeing you in CS! :-) IMO, this would definitely fall in the weenie protest arena, but the rulebook re
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg01013.html (9,170 bytes)
- 105. Re: Do Porsche Boxsters have LSD? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 09:18:09 -0500
- A Stock will be a dogfight next year. The Boxter's hp/weight ratio compares favorably with the 944S2 and 968 and should be competitive. Whether it can hang with the S2000 may depend on the course. Th
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg01149.html (8,960 bytes)
- 106. Re: Do Porsche Boxsters have LSD? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 11:48:29 -0500
- Yep, the S2000 is in AS along with the Audi TT Quattro and the Audi S4. I was guessing SS for the Honda, although it does suffer from a lack of torque. The Audi drivers will be facing an uphill battl
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg01152.html (10,385 bytes)
- 107. Re: SS changes (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 08:45:45 -0400
- I forgot about the old Vettes. At least move all the pre-84s to FS. That would be an improvement, although they'd still be a long shot. Kent Rafferty
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00006.html (7,374 bytes)
- 108. Re: Heat cycled, shaved? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:04:44 -0400
- 315s on 9.5" rims are generally not recommended, BUT I have seen them work well on an older C4. Derek Sivret was the fastest C4 at the Harrisburg Pro with 315s on 9.5" wheels on all four corners of h
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00008.html (7,698 bytes)
- 109. Re: Rx7 TT in Super Stock (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 08:22:57 -0400
- Good question. There are a few cars that MAY end up in SS that *could* overtake the RX-7: The new Boxter S at 2800 lbs and 250 hp; The 2001 C5 Corvette with 385-ish hp and the new for '00 Z51 suspens
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00151.html (7,292 bytes)
- 110. Re: C4 Vette (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 17:45:16 -0400
- Quite a few great Vette drivers switched to RX7s for a reason. Some of these drivers, like Thomason and Kotzian, are obviously drivers of the highest caliber. The C4 can trophy in SS (obviously), bu
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00350.html (9,297 bytes)
- 111. Re: C4 Vette (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 10:33:40 -0400
- Pat makes a good point, although there is some debate about which C4 is the best autox C4. Bottom line is there is no place to move the C4 without it becoming the dominant car, and no compelling reas
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00427.html (8,438 bytes)
- 112. Re: swaybar info (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 15:37:05 -0400
- John's proposal is an interesting one. To add to his post, the SCAC could factor the swaybar restriction into its new car classing. Alternatively, we could set a date, say 2003, when all stock cars h
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00727.html (8,154 bytes)
- 113. Re: swaybar info (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:25:30 -0400
- Sorry Mark, IMO, it is broke....... An aftermarket swaybar ain't stock, and no, swaybars aren't wear items - even for autoxers...... BTW, what would *you* rather fixate on?? :-) Kent Rafferty
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00731.html (7,106 bytes)
- 114. Re: need wheels (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 08:24:00 -0400
- One of the cheapest (ahem, inexpensive) sources for 17s is Complete Custom Wheel out of Florida. Last time I checked, 17s were selling for about $400/wheel - still not cheap but about the best I've s
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg01258.html (7,427 bytes)
- 115. 944S2 vs 968 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 13:58:40 -0400
- I'm comparing the Porsche 968 vs the Porsche 944S2. Both cars can be outfitted with the M030 package, so the difference seems to be weight and hp. The 944S2 is lighter, while the 968 has more hp (and
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00063.html (6,632 bytes)
- 116. Re: ProSolo next year? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 15:12:24 -0400
- I would agree that the P classes left something to be desired. Although considered the featured classes, nobody at the event cared except the P drivers. I remember running in the Peru Pro Sat. aftern
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00082.html (7,547 bytes)
- 117. Re: Audi TT in GS (Was: Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming....") (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 11:09:37 -0400
- So, potentially you could have the following match-up in GS (excluding the Type R, etc for now), correct? Car hp weight lbs/hp -- -- -- -- Audi TT Quattro 225 3200 14.2 Audi S4 250 3500 14.0 DSM AWD
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00266.html (8,254 bytes)
- 118. Steve Waters email address (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 10:20:13 -0400
- Does anyone have Steve Water's email address? Kent Rafferty
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00527.html (6,224 bytes)
- 119. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:54:30 -0400
- Boy that's a slippery slope......... Ask 10 autocrossers what constitutes a megabucks car and you'll get 10 different answers. Kent Rafferty
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01347.html (9,103 bytes)
- 120. Re: 1999 Solo II Nationals Index results (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:52:35 -0400
- It'll be hard to draw conclusions from this Nationals. Rain definitely had an impact on SOME Tues/Weds classes. I believe both the CSP and BS classes ran in the rain on one day. Thurs/Fri course were
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01362.html (8,440 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu