to to it. at Revolution, So, bargain Instead, it needs _management_, so it will issue. I really object to those who don't participate in ProSolo being so willing to throw out the baby because he has
You're starting at the wrong end IMHO. Start by deciding what type of spraygun you are planning on using, the older style HP gun or the newer technology better LPHV gun and, if using a LPHV gun then
Is anyone else concerned that divorcing Solo1 from Solo2 is the first major step in dropping the Solo2 program entirely? We already know that there was serious talk of deleting Prosolo this year and
fall It IMHO it should NOT be run at the sole whim of one individual who can and does change the rules at the flip of a ponytail who seems to consider it a pain in the posterior and has no incentive
If you look at the map of the planned renovations in the upper left corner are two large (?) areas designated AX pads! WooHoo! -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Hardy" <dave2020@mindspring.com> To:
registered for the street at one time, which this car was. The title is not being transferred to subsequent owners to keep it's race/show car only status. Just curious, was this a factory supplied R&
Typical govt bureacracy at work! Let's see, how can we make this much more complex and expensive... ?? Didn't anyone there ever hear of an odometer? (maybe not, you don't ever look at one riding in t
IMHO this type of scheme is championed by some high tech company looking to sell the government a bill of goods on the idea by baffling them with BS justifications, then winning a highly lucrative co
No, I'm saying that the companies pushing for red light cameras have only one goal, and that's to make a large profit off of operating them, not to help anyone or save lives. The politicians are hiri
Yes, evidently from the tone of the letter we just received, Solo2 is the ugly stepchild at SCCA. Sounds like they were giving serious consideration to dropping the Prosolo series entirely in 2005, a
So as I understand this, SCCA is probably going to force a lot of Solo participants to buy a new (and some would say LESS protective) helmet because an EXPERIMENTAL airbag designed to reduce injuries
Did someone get the message, or was yesterday Nov 17 Fools day?? The "advisory" has disappeared off the SCCA website. -- Original Message -- From: "Mark Sirota" <mark@sirota.org> To: "Chuck" <golden1
Why then if this is such a rush safety issue would the relegate the advisory to such an inconspicuous location after such a short time??? Original Message -- From: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net> To
Ever see the slow motion test dummy crashes they show on TV? The bag hits in the chest and his head falls forward into it like a pillow as the shoulder strap ratchet releases (as it is designed to do
The ONLY justification for this advisory by SCCA was the cited study. Any other reasons is pure wild speculation and second guessing on the part of the membership at this time. If there IS any other
With all due respect and nothing personal, there has been no official word that our insurance carrier is in any way involved, so you're championing a speculative reason. However if they should get w
AFAIK the only annual tech SCCA recognizes in Solo2 is that used in Pro Solo, it's not officially used at even National tours. After that it's up to the individual event organizers if they want to us