Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:edk@kinetric.com: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [evolution-disc.] Way to finance our Solo2..... (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:45:45 -0600
Doesn't the selling price need to have margin in it to amortize the effort and expense that goes into creating and maintaining the rules themselves? _If_ that cost is now paid by whatever agency gets
/html/autox/2005-03/msg00067.html (11,710 bytes)

2. RE: Radios at ProSolos (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 20:57:27 -0500
Hey, next time keep your 'pinion to yourself. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.te
/html/autox/2003-07/msg00128.html (8,049 bytes)

3. RE: Topeka Pro pictures (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:16:21 -0500
I think every parent should get .100 sec taken off each run per kid in a kart running in the same event :-) Ed Koffeman 2 kids running Karts /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@auto
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00349.html (6,827 bytes)

4. Re: We got a Mini (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:21:42 -0500
No problem, William. I hope it will be a fair and close fight too! Ed Koffeman /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo ///
/html/autox/2002-04/msg00163.html (7,200 bytes)

5. Re: Tire warmup area. (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 08:42:46 -0500
I wouldn't like to see that. a. Solo II already has an untimed portion of the run before the timing lights where people can theoretically already trade off wheelspin for heat vs ultimate accelerativ
/html/autox/2002-04/msg00385.html (8,743 bytes)

6. Classification for BMW 325es? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:43:14 -0600
OK, rule mavens and E30 BMWers: The 2002 GS line says "325E, eta engine" Does that mean "325e but not 325es" comma "All BMWs with ETA engine"? or "325e with ETA engine" So, does a 325es fall in GS or
/html/autox/2002-02/msg00003.html (8,411 bytes)

7. Re: Classification for BMW 325es? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:59:57 -0600
I was looking at: http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2002/stockc.html which isn't necessaritly the final word, but I assumed it was close enough at this point. Ed Koffeman /// unsubscribe/change
/html/autox/2002-02/msg00005.html (8,241 bytes)

8. Re: Classification for BMW 325es? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:43:23 -0600
Hmmm.... I have read that the front springs were different and the sway bars (at least the fron if not both) were thicker on the 'es' than on the 'e'. But as long as an 'es' is seen as an 'e' with o
/html/autox/2002-02/msg00010.html (8,353 bytes)

9. Re: Classification for BMW 325es? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 09:15:12 -0600
So, to recap: The line BMW "325e, ETA engine" should be interpreted as: BMW "325 (all with ETA engine)" e.g. BMW 325, 325e, 325es Anyone think that isn't correct? Ed Koffeman /// unsubscribe/change a
/html/autox/2002-02/msg00022.html (7,949 bytes)

10. Re: Classification for BMW 325es? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Koffeman" <edk@kinetric.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:31:45 -0600
That all makes sense. The only mystery to me then is why there's a comma in there or anything besides "352e". It makes it look like there are two things being classed on the line, the 325e and also
/html/autox/2002-02/msg00164.html (12,171 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu