- 1. Re: autox chat room (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:07:39 -0400
- LSD was a failed attempt at mind expansion. Unix, however, was a _successful_ attempt at mind expansion. As for the chat room/IRC channel... we have a Talon IRC channel that is occasionally useful, a
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00276.html (7,804 bytes)
- 2. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 14:49:03 -0400
- Why should "stock" and "race" be mutually exclusive, especially when talking about Showroom Stock racing (or for that matter, Solo Stock)? Are "Stock" cars not allowed to be fast? Quick! Hide that Vi
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00448.html (9,680 bytes)
- 3. Re: Another Question (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:48:53 -0400
- Here is an actual transcript from Byron Short's new product "Oh, Geeeez!", which makes a recording of driver thoughts during a run, recorded during a left-side course run at the Petersburg Pro this y
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00548.html (7,444 bytes)
- 4. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:43:22 -0400
- Karl Witt <kwitt@shore.net> That's the gist of it. 15lbs of boost @3000RPM, 10 lbs of boost @ 6000RPM. The T25 is a cork. Because it doesn't happen. 1st gear is so short that boost creep never happen
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00798.html (12,220 bytes)
- 5. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:56:21 -0400
- Not "out of every slow turn" because we have LAG to deal with. The start, yes - because I've got the motor wound up to 7000 RPM and dumping the clutch - but once the car is moving, how fast you make
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00846.html (13,251 bytes)
- 6. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 10:39:59 -0400
- So far, so good. Nothing to disagree with here. Again, agreed. If you take recent National Tour and ProSolo results into account things are a _little_ better for the DSMs, in that DSMs have turned ti
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00849.html (14,335 bytes)
- 7. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 13:04:57 -0400
- Yup. When you compare your times with Andy B. and a few others I know, the differential is higher on Day 1 than on Day 2. It suggests on "off day". prior) No kidding. He suprised the hell out of me
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00864.html (13,607 bytes)
- 8. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 09:59:20 -0400
- ...and I don't like insta-torque V-8s with more rubber under their car than I could cram under 2 DSMs, but whatever... :P But you didn't get out of the car thinking it was an overdog, did you? How w
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00939.html (14,059 bytes)
- 9. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:36:05 -0400
- Oh, sure. Take away EVERYTHING ELSE I (and other DSM owners) may have updated or backdated too. The prevailing attitude may be that the DSMs are new on the scene, but that is NOT the case. These car
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00960.html (9,890 bytes)
- 10. Re: DSM Update/Backdate was: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:46:55 -0400
- Always happy to entertain.... ;) Well, even from a purely philosophical viewpoint, I don't think you can separate history from theory when it comes to update/backdate. No matter what one's opinion i
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00972.html (10,850 bytes)
- 11. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@chrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 15:46:07 -0400
- Teasing? Try "raping". Ahh, enough of this. I've got a long drive to Harrisburg ahead of me, and I'm afraid the damn truck is going to explode, and my wife is leaving Sunday for a course and will be
- /html/autox/1999-06/msg00979.html (9,020 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu