- 1. Re: 10 year Maximum Age for Stock Class (was Reclassing) (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 20:24:05 EDT
- I don't often speak up here but... I don't understand what you are trying to accomplish with this aside from making a lot of people angry at you? Are you trying to boost the economy? Are you a car sa
- /html/autox/2002-05/msg00017.html (8,874 bytes)
- 2. Re: 10 year Maximum Age for Stock Class (was Reclassing) (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 00:26:23 EDT
- OK, thanks for clearing up some of the motivations behind this idea. I can't say as I agree with much of it myself. As someone who has never owned a new car... nor do I see myself owning a new car an
- /html/autox/2002-05/msg00027.html (10,042 bytes)
- 3. Re: $2002 Challenge - not really (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 12:17:52 EST
- I think you are missing the point. Have you read the rules for the challenge? You actually managed to demonstrate the reason for the $2002 challenge in your post, though it doesn't seem you realize
- /html/autox/2002-03/msg00152.html (8,368 bytes)
- 4. Re: Driving Simulators (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:09:56 EST
- The best thing I've driven is "Grand Prix Legends" by Sierra. 1967 Formula One cars. As far as a driving simulators go, it is generally accepted to be the best. I'm surprised noone here has mentioned
- /html/autox/2001-12/msg00148.html (7,475 bytes)
- 5. Re: G forces in AM cars (was: Why concrete?) (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:51:29 EDT
- Please, at what speed was the 1100 lbs of downforce measured? -STEFAN ...building an A-mod <SNIP> /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@a
- /html/autox/2001-08/msg00329.html (7,179 bytes)
- 6. Re: Audi Does it Again. (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:13:37 EDT
- Flames shooting out of the back of a car (especially running in endurance racing) is not a good thing! Flames out the back is fuel in the exhaust igniting. Fuel in the exhaust is fuel not burned in t
- /html/autox/2001-06/msg00281.html (8,575 bytes)
- 7. RE: Audi Does it Again. (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:18:34 EDT
- Right, of course. I thought that was understood. You only see the flames when the driver is off the gas. But the things I said about wasted fuel still apply. -STEFAN == OR, the driver was simply "off
- /html/autox/2001-06/msg00285.html (8,042 bytes)
- 8. Re: Audi Does it Again. (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:40:14 EDT
- Thanks for the additional information. I already understood why it happens but did not know that the endurance guys purposely run that "comfortably rich" setup. Though once you said that, it "clicked
- /html/autox/2001-06/msg00288.html (10,484 bytes)
- 9. Re: Audi Does it Again. (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:12:44 EDT
- Well, I've been informed of quite a few important details on this subject. First of all, it makes complete sense (now that someone mentioned it) that with the long laps of LeMans, the idea of leaning
- /html/autox/2001-06/msg00314.html (10,176 bytes)
- 10. Re: harness bar legality in stock? (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:48:19 EST
- I've never posted to the list before though I've been lurking for over a year I helped Matt install this harness bar so I kinda have an interest in the subject. As far as comparing his harnes bar to
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00571.html (13,971 bytes)
- 11. Re: harness bar legality in stock? (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:15:44 EST
- Yeah, that's the animal. I read the thread. Saw the questions. They didn't go over it in as much excruciating nitpickety detail as is traditional for team.net but, point taken. I think that this bar
- /html/autox/2001-03/msg00575.html (9,421 bytes)
- 12. Re: AM (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:00:51 EST
- In a message dated 12/22/1999, 9:52:59 AM, pfoster@gdi.net writes: <<<<Yeah, but the true worth of AM is not limited to Nationals. It is a place for all the oddball one-offs that show up (or want to
- /html/autox/1999-12/msg00941.html (9,400 bytes)
- 13. Re: Re: AM (score: 1)
- Author: Stefanv@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 09:43:49 EST
- I looked at the website... You have got to be kidding me that those things weigh 435 pounds! Is that with or without driver? Keep in mind that the AM rules require 700 pounds withOUT driver. -STEFAN
- /html/autox/1999-12/msg01138.html (7,812 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu