Mail Archive Search: <+from:J28Starnes@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:J28Starnes@aol.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Which CRX for CSP (score: 1): Author: J28Starnes@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 18:38:59 EDT; I would agree the 88 CRX may have a better suspension set-up than other CRXs. In addition, the '97 and '98 Acura Integra Type R has the rear suspension of the '88 CRX. The CRX has about 8mm lower rea; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00832.html (6,795 bytes)
2. Friday Results are up! (score: 1): Author: J28Starnes@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 18:58:57 EDT; Compared to everyone's comments about the G-stock Integra Type R, I expected the car to beat the entire field by 10 seconds. Hmmm! 1st place G-stock's time was 121.480, 1st place H-stock's time was 1; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00834.html (6,867 bytes)
3. Re: G stock Type R (score: 1): Author: J28Starnes@aol.com; Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 18:05:32 EDT; << autox@autox.team.net >> You should compare the "R" to the H-Stock class. Two tenths of a second difference from the 1st place G-Stock from the 1st place H-Stock. So the "R" is a dominant car??? Hm; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00861.html (6,542 bytes)
4. Re: Type R info, Civic Question (was: Re: M3s and Neons and Type (score: 1): Author: J28Starnes@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 19:43:38 EDT; << AUTOX@autox.team.net >> Just curious, but how much torque (and where is the peak on RPMs) does the Type R, Neon, and M3 have that you are discussing. Like I said, just curious!!!; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01200.html (7,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]