Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:COXB@trimofran.org: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

61. Re: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 17:04:25 -0600
This is a little off topic, but I can't think of a car currently running in SS that's SM legal to begin with. Are there any? -brad
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00765.html (7,564 bytes)

62. Re: New thoughts on roll cages in SP and SM (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 17:09:00 -0600
Oops! I think I just answered my own stupid question. You meant "showroom -brad (it's been a long day) in
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00766.html (7,592 bytes)

63. Re: Honda S2000 wheels (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:17:08 -0600
Speaking of wheels, doesn't the s2000 have larger rear wheels than front? If you have a car like this, is it legal under stock specs to go with one wheel size all the way around, or do you have to st
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00846.html (6,826 bytes)

64. Re: A Friday Physics Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:22:32 -0600
the same a uneffected, I think the lateral acceleration would be the same for car B, assuming they are both travelling the same speed around a given turn and car B has twice the mass. (F=2MA or F/2=
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00869.html (8,822 bytes)

65. Re: was mr2's in D prepared, now stripped interior in SP???? (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:13:58 -0600
tires must fit within the wheel wells.... This weekend I saw a CRX with a 'very' gutted interior, roll cage, etc. He was running in CSP. Is this actually legal? I thought the rules in SP were pretty
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00945.html (7,328 bytes)

66. Re: BFG R1 215/50 R13 (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 07:48:55 -0600
Would these tires fit ok on a 9" rim? Thanx! -brad
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00988.html (6,212 bytes)

67. Tires: contact patch size/shape (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 13:27:10 -0500
There is an interesting debate on another list about contact patch size. I felt who more qualified to answer than the people who regularly push their poor contact patches to the limit? The big questi
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00036.html (7,017 bytes)

68. Re: Building A Nationals Winning Car (ESP) (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 08:15:45 -0500
That's something every autocrosser in Texas would like to know. 8) -brad
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00199.html (8,132 bytes)

69. backspacing for race wheels (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:20:42 -0500
I'm about to purchase a set of 13x9 inch wheels for autocross. Does anyone run a similar setup on a 6th gen civic? If so, what amount of backspacing did you require in order for adequate clearance? B
/html/autox/1999-10/msg00552.html (6,649 bytes)

70. Re: PC response to stolen car notice-no autox content (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 11:16:16 -0500
after having one of our cars stolen and realizing that the >local police don't even bother to come out to the "scene" any more I understand your frustration. As a driver of a perceived "rice" rod ('
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01066.html (9,546 bytes)

71. Re: Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:15:12 -0500
Thank goodness this statement is completely untrue. Not that chasing cones is social hour or anything, but it's a great way to get to know some of the racers whom I would not normally meet. IMHO, I
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01124.html (9,357 bytes)

72. Re: Entry fee costs. Was 'Why not "pro" cone chasers? (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 15:11:21 -0500
$21.00, or $16.00 for SCCA members. 8) -brad
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01156.html (6,789 bytes)

73. Re: Lower Cost Improvements (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 15:40:05 -0500
My disclaimer: I am not a mechanic. TAJMOATPS (these are just my opinions and they probably stink). lack the durability of platinum. Drag racers tend to go with the copper plugs, and nothing weird l
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01228.html (8,571 bytes)

74. Thanks Engstroms!!!!! (not that one?) (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:35:29 -0500
While thank you's are being swapped, I certainly don't want y'all to be left Just wanted you to know how APPRECIATED you are here in the TX region. You guys are always so busy, it's hard to find you
/html/autox/1999-10/msg01478.html (6,750 bytes)

75. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:11:31 -0500
Have to agree. A couple of guys in my area are running the v-6 camaros. They beat the pants off the integras around here. They're amazingly close to the f-stockers. -brad
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00281.html (8,564 bytes)

76. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:44:55 -0500
On another note, with all the ST stuff going on around here, I think it's a great idea to have the DSM and the Type R in the same class. There is a big rivalry among these guys in the import drag cro
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00286.html (8,716 bytes)

77. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 08:36:28 -0500
or '00. Uh, sorry Bob. I didn't write that. I don't know nuthin about Type R's. I think my name got stuck in the wrong spot on a reply or something. I just made a comment about the acura/DSM rivalry
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00450.html (8,107 bytes)

78. Re: During your trip in Topeka..... (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 16:46:04 -0500
Also, along the same lines, please pull over to make a cell phone call. Thanx!
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00490.html (6,890 bytes)

79. more STU stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:20:51 -0500
I think this STU discussion is part of what's neat about the class. It really will be a very open situation. Some people are worried, but I think it will need to be this way because of the radical im
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00776.html (8,173 bytes)

80. Re: more STU stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:24:55 -0500
Oops! I meant Mcmillan's CRX. BTW, congrats! think have of car cat. lag now. turbo 250hp will developed high
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00779.html (8,892 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu