- 1. 1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters (score: 1)
- Author: MrZAG57@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 22:28:18 EST
- It's been a while since I've opened my BIG mouth, so let's get it ALL out there. Maybe I can start a new riot. 1). First I am building a 1725 for the race car, BUT the 1600 I have raced the last two
- /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00147.html (10,347 bytes)
- 2. Re: 1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters (score: 1)
- Author: GSTROM99@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:00:54 EST
- Well, I won't go any where near his motor work comments, since I don't now nuthin 'bout racing Alpine motors, but I need to tell the list that Eric is the proud new Daddy of a baby girl! Another new
- /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00151.html (7,638 bytes)
- 3. Re: 1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters (score: 1)
- Author: GSTROM99@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:17:21 EST
- With that new found power and speed, I bet coming into The Kink... or Turn Twelve ... or Turn 5 should be a whole experience! How's your brakes? I'll be there to help ya! Gary
- /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00153.html (7,443 bytes)
- 4. Re: 1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters (score: 1)
- Author: Christopher.Albers@bubbs.biola.edu (Christopher Albers)
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 07:40:41 -0800
- I have just begun beseeching the Lord that you are successful... On my knees, CNA
- /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00156.html (7,818 bytes)
- 5. Re: 1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg Locke" <glocke@ihug.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:37:22 +1300
- Please please please, I would love to know the details of your 1965 cc engine. I have read of lots of different fromulas for such a lump, but one more before I embark on my own would be most apprecia
- /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00169.html (12,554 bytes)
- 6. Re: 1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters (score: 1)
- Author: GSTROM99@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:18:21 EST
- that Careful here... Roller LIFTERS allow a more radical "ramp" on the cam, so the lifter doesn't "dig" into the cam, and the resulting valve opening time is a huge improvement. Eric is talking about
- /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00178.html (7,779 bytes)
- 7. Re: 1600 vs 1725 / Chevy Rods / Isky / Lifters (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg Locke" <glocke@ihug.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 13:20:58 +1300
- Yeah, but the roller rockers are generally made of lightweight material, that further reduces inertia in the valve train, allowing the valve to more accurately follow a more radical cam profile. And
- /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00185.html (8,517 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu