Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Roller\s+rockers\s+continued\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Roller\s+rockers\s+continued\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: michael lunsford <mblunsfordsr@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 08:15:58 -0800 (PST); Thanks for all of your responses. For you additional information the rockers are the Goodparts 1.55/1 ratio. My question really related to the average of 30 PSI loss in compression and yes, with a n; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00474.html (8,002 bytes)
2. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:23:09 -0500; I have been following along with the current posts regarding this subject; I have been busy so I haven't been able to respond until now! You should not have had any decrease in compression gauge rea; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00477.html (8,592 bytes)
3. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 22:20:03 -0800 (PST); Jim S.--Looks like we have agreed to disagree with the loss of pressure (with the RR ratio increase) Here are my thoughts. We know that the increase in the ratio will hold both valves open longer dur; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00492.html (10,060 bytes)
4. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 07:45:34 -0500; "We know that the increase in the ratio will hold both valves open longer during the overlap segment of the stroke, while cranking". Let's all think about this for a moment. Imagine this scenario: b; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00494.html (9,996 bytes)
5. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Walt Philipson" <wphilipson@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:48:47 -0500; I agree with your premise that you can't change the cam profile with rocker ratio, but I believe you can change the effective duration at the valve. Since valve travel and acceleration are related t; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00496.html (11,386 bytes)
6. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:35:39 -0500; I had to think about it for a few minutes, but you're right. I had not considered the fact that, given the same initial valve lash (.010), the higher ratio rocker will contact the valve stem earlier; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00508.html (9,502 bytes)
7. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:26:07 -0500; I looked at my sent items. I had touchi spelled correctly the first time. I used the apostrophe key to add the pronunciation symbol while typing and MS word automatically corrected it to the proper; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00511.html (10,988 bytes)
8. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:52:01 -0500; Once again with plain text enabled. Touchi; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00512.html (7,475 bytes)
9. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Gene Holtzclaw" <motrv8d@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 23:57:04 +0000; Jim, I understand what you are saying about overall lift yet I think that where you are possibly wrong is amount of valve lift during overlap. If the stock rockers open both valves at overlap, say .0; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00513.html (11,518 bytes)
10. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:19:22 -0500; I have no idea why my text is not as should be. Oh well, I guess there are better things to figure out. Jim Once again with plain text enabled. Touchi; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00514.html (7,858 bytes)
11. Re: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "James Franks" <jimmble@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:46:10 -0500; It is a Lucas message server. Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha! I crack myself up!; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00515.html (8,318 bytes)
12. RE: Roller rockers continued (score: 1): Author: "Jim Swarthout" <jswarth1@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:43:52 -0500; I tried both plain text, and rich text! Both produced the same result. I have not tried HTML! Is this possible on this list? If not, why not? Jim Jim Try going to Format, then select Plain Text inst; /html/6pack/2002-11/msg00517.html (8,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]