Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Laycock\s+or\s+Borg\s+n\s+Beck\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Laycock\s+or\s+Borg\s+n\s+Beck\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Laycock or Borg n Beck ? (score: 1): Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 00:44:55 -0400; Hi Pat, Gunst recommends the Luk, and strongly recommends against the B&B with bent fingers. Both Nelson and Dick Taylor have had good success with the B&B with Bent fingers and the Gunst T/O bearing; /html/6pack/2003-08/msg00387.html (10,323 bytes)
2. Re: Laycock or Borg n Beck ? (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:58:37 -0700 (PDT); Don, and group--It stands to reason that a "softer" clutch would be easier on the hardware that disengages it. The clutch fork pin, in particular, wouldn't be so prone to break. Still, I had the same; /html/6pack/2003-08/msg00395.html (8,236 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]