Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+CLUTCH\s+MASTER\s+CYLINDER\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+CLUTCH\s+MASTER\s+CYLINDER\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] CLUTCH MASTER CYLINDER (score: 1): Author: michael lunsford <mblunsfordsr@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:55:27 -0800 (PST); I don't know how the length of the throw on a .75 (early) clutch MC compares with the later.70 diameter clutch. I do know from experience that the early .75 clutch requires more pressure than the lat; /html/6pack/2008-12/msg00129.html (7,540 bytes)
2. Re: [6pack] CLUTCH MASTER CYLINDER (score: 1): Author: Mark Steph <tr6@pobox.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:24:35 -0600; There is another factor here: There were 2 different clutch systems supplied. I cannot for the life of me remember which years had what, but there were both Laycock and Borg & Beck clutches fitted to; /html/6pack/2008-12/msg00130.html (8,199 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] CLUTCH MASTER CYLINDER (score: 1): Author: Jim Franks <jimmble@roadrunner.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:00:37 -0500; Mark, the Laycock was the easier one to push. The threads on both masters are the same. The fitting likes to mushroom after the first installation, making it a bugger to re-install. Jim Franks ______; /html/6pack/2008-12/msg00131.html (7,760 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]