Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"Poor\s+Man\'s\s+Cam\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"Poor\s+Man\'s\s+Cam\"\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: "Poor Man's Cam" (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:08:30 -0400 (EDT); Thus quoteth: I would love to find some 1.50 ratio rockers for a reasonable price. What's a "reasonable price"? Just curious. You can put a set of 1.5 rocker together for about $360 plus shipping. I; /html/6pack/2005-06/msg00005.html (7,066 bytes)
2. Re: "Poor Man's Cam" (score: 1): Author: "Terry Geiger" <tgeiger@ShoalsBritishCars.org>; Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:21:45 -0500; I agree, $360 is a reasonable price for roller rockers. I've checked with TSI and put them on the wish list. It's good to know they are readily available. The car is running great for the moment and; /html/6pack/2005-06/msg00006.html (7,634 bytes)
3. "Poor Man's Cam" (score: 1): Author: kmcnelis@nmsu.edu; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 16:10:21 -0600; Ok, I've been lurking, and read the posts about 1.65:1 roller rockers, referred to as "poor man's cam". That's me- not necessarily a poor man, but one who can't whine too much about new stuff for the; /html/6pack/2005-05/msg00383.html (7,081 bytes)
4. RE: "Poor Man's Cam" (score: 1): Author: "Shawn J. Loseke" <sloseke@holly.colostate.edu>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:29:45 -0600; Sort of a misnomer. "Poor man's cam" simply because it is a "bolt on" performance upgrade. The Goodparts complete 1.65:1 roller rocker set (ready to go) runs $669. You can swap a cam and its tappets; /html/6pack/2005-05/msg00384.html (7,612 bytes)
5. Re: "Poor Man's Cam" (score: 1): Author: "Terry Geiger" <tgeiger@ShoalsBritishCars.org>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:04:01 -0500; I have a used set of 1.75:1 ratio arms for sale on ebay.... item # < http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4552880429&category=34202&sspagename=WDVW; /html/6pack/2005-05/msg00398.html (7,794 bytes)
6. Re: "Poor Man's Cam" (score: 1): Author: "Terry Geiger" <tgeiger@ShoalsBritishCars.org>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:34:51 -0500; The reason for removing the roller rockers was because I went to a higher lift camshaft during a recent rework of the engine and the 1.75:1 ratio would have caused spring binding, not to mention a r; /html/6pack/2005-05/msg00403.html (7,640 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]