Jack Drews wrote:
> Hmmm.....this could get to be an interesting discussion, if we apply the
questions
> to individuals. Forget about the autenticity of the car -- I vote for a
minimum age
> for drivers -- like maybe a driver must have been of legal driving age for the
car
> he's racing during the year of its manufacture.......
If this is the qualification, I think Uncle Jack and myself could probably
race Locomobiles or Stanley Steamers. ;)
Paul Meis, Team Escargot, '69 NTM D-sports racer. "Age and treachery will
overcome youth and skill"
----------
>From: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
>To: Derek Harling <derek.lola@home.com>
>Subject: Re: But IS it a Vintage Racer? (was Eastlake)
>Date: Tue, Nov 7, 2000, 10:29 AM
>
> Derek Harling wrote:
>
>> Gregory Nagy wrote:
>>
>> > I am sure the answer varies from organization to organization, but
what
>> > constitutes a "vintage/historic" sports racing car?
...........................
>>
>> Let me barge in with a first answer.
>>
>> The are two extremes -
>> 1 - on an absolute basis obviously it is NOT a vintage racer
>> 2 - on the other hand there are some organizations who would accept it.
>>
>> In between those extremes there are a thousand different alternative opinions
>> encompassing ALL organizations and, for that matter, individuals.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> You pays your
>> money . . . . . . .
>>
>> Of course you could also debate it ad nausium - and some people enjoy that .
. .
>> . . . .
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> uncle jack
>
> The Attorney General advises that vintage racing may be injurious to your
wealth.
>
>
|